Voluntary Cough Acoustic Signals Differentiate Disease State and Swallowing Safety Status: A Data Set in Healthy Controls vs. Motor Speech Disordered Patients
Watts, S. A.; Awan, S. N.; Ebraheem, M.; Moothedan, E.; Pitts, T.; Bensoussan, Y.
Show abstract
ObjectiveChanges in voluntary cough airflow are an established detector of swallowing safety in neurogenic dysphagia. The objective of the current project was to determine if acoustic measures of voluntary cough acoustic signals could be used to differentiate (1) healthy versus diseased state, (2) between disordered groups with Parkinsons disease (PD) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and (3) those who have airway invasion during swallowing and those who do not (safe vs. unsafe swallows). MethodsVideofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) and voluntary coughs were obtained from PD and ALS participants (n=10 and n=13 respectively) and age matched controls (n=10). Participants with PD and ALS were striated into safe and unsafe swallowing groups using the penetration aspiration scale (PAS) on VFSS. Cough acoustic waveforms were processed with Python 3.11.4 and audio signal processing library Librosa 0.10.0 for extracting Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCCs) and related acoustic measures of zero crossing rate (ZCR), spectral centroid, spectral bandwidth, spectral roll off, and spectral contrast. ResultsMFCC 5 emerged as the strongest acoustic discriminator between healthy and disordered populations with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the (AUC) = 0.80, sensitivity = 0.83, specificity = 0.73. MFCC 5 was also observed to successfully categorize healthy vs. PD subjects (ROC AUC = 0.84), while ZCR successfully categorized healthy vs. ALS subjects (AUC = 0.79). MFCC 2 successfully categorized ALS vs. PD subjects (AUC = 0.79), and MFCC 13 emerged as the best acoustic classifier of subjects with safe vs. unsafe swallow (AUC = 0.81). ConclusionsCough creates a distinct sound pattern during the transition from a compression phase, or closure of the glottis, to expiration. These results demonstrate that, even with a conservative approach to acoustic analysis of voluntary cough signals, MFCC analyses, along with other acoustic features including ZCR, show the potential for distinguishing between disease states and swallowing safety status with strong classification accuracy. Further research on the physiologic etiology of these acoustic differences is needed to provide thorough interpretation of the characteristics of healthy vs. disordered coughs.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery 91%
- Electromyographic Correlates of Effortful Listening in the Vestigial Auriculomotor System 90%
- Differential Effects of Pathological Beta Burst Dynamics Between Parkinson’s Disease Phenotypes Across Different Movements 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerodigestoscopy (ADS): A retrospective examination of the feasibility, safety, and comfort of a new procedure for the evaluation of physiological disorders of the aerodigestive tract 92%
- Feasibility of an App-Assisted and Home-Based Video Version of the Timed up and Go Test for Patients with Parkinson Disease: vTUG 91%
- Neural adaptation at stimulus onset and speed of neural processing as critical contributors to speech comprehension independent of hearing threshold or age 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.