Variational autoencoder for interpretable seizure onset phases detection
Capallera, I.; Mercadal, B.; Bartolomei, F.; Ruffini, G.
Show abstract
In this study, we describe a deep learning framework for automated seizure annotation in stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) data of patients with focal epilepsy. We use a one-dimensional Variational Autoencoder (VAE) for feature extraction of single-channel temporal series and a linear classifier for segment classification. We trained the network using data from 37 patients containing manual annotations of ictal and Low-Voltage Fast Activity (LVFA) by clinicians. The 1D VAE encodes two-second SEEG segments into a low-dimensional representation in latent space and then classifies them as interictal, ictal, or LVFA segments. We used 5-fold cross-validation for training and validation. Our system classified ictal vs. interictal 2 second segments with an average recall of 0.88. For whole-channel seizure annotation, we combine the probabilities of all its segments and compute the Area Under Curve (AUC) of the exponentially smoothed probability signal, marking the onset of both ictal and LVFA, a high average recall of 0.86, with even higher performance (0.91) on channels identified by clinicians as belonging to the Seizure Onset Zone (SOZ). The markers were also temporally accurate, with a mean (median) time lag of 9.8 (5.0) seconds for the ictal onset and a mean (median) lag of 2.0 (0.8) seconds for LVFA. Additionally, latent space analysis suggests that multiple dimensions correlate with class-relevant SEEG features that the classifier pays attention to, most notably amplitude and spectral power, which provides an explainability component to the network. As a secondary objective, we obtain a seizure detection recall of 99% with a specificity of 95%. Our findings suggest that a VAE-based approach can produce a meaningful latent space from SEEG data and leverage it to detect seizures and fast onset patterns, potentially helping clinicians reduce the workload of SEEG review. HighlightsO_LIWe introduce a VAE-based system for automatic annotation of ictal and LVFA phases in SEEG data from patients with focal epilepsy. C_LIO_LIAchieves average 86% recall on ictal detection, 91% on the Seizure Onset Zone (SOZ), and 74% on LVFA detection. C_LIO_LIProvides interpretability by linking latent space dimensions and classification importance to physiological SEEG features in the time and frequency domain C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Event Driven Neural Network on a Mixed Signal Neuromorphic Processor for EEG Based Epileptic Seizure Detection 95%
- Recurrent Neural Network-based Acute Concussion Classifier using Raw Resting State EEG Data 95%
- NLP-based tools for localization of the Epileptogenic Zone in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual epilepsy patient cohort: generation and evaluation 95%
- Data-driven method to infer the seizure propagation patterns in an epileptic brain from intracranial electroencephalography 94%
- Evidence for spreading seizure as a cause of theta-alpha activity electrographic pattern in stereo-EEG seizure recordings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wavelet Phase Coherence of Ictal Scalp EEG-Extracted Muscle Activity (SMA) as a Biomarker for Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) 95%
- Automatic diagnostics of electroencephalography pathology based on multi-domain feature fusion 94%
- Velocities of Hippocampal Traveling Waves Proportional to Their Coherence Frequency 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SingleChannelNet: A Model for Automatic Sleep Stage Classification with Raw Single-Channel EEG 93%
- Unveiling Stimulus Transduction Artifacts in Auditory Steady-State Response Experiments: Characterization, Risks, and Mitigation Strategies 93%
- Evaluating three different adaptive decomposition methods for EEG signal seizure detection and classification 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.