Back

Muscle activation assessment using ultrasound time-harmonic elastography and tonic vibration reflex

Aghamiry, H. S.; Meyer, T.; Klemmer Chandiaa, S.; Engl, P.; Valli, G.; Wu, Y.; Kurz, E.; Schwesig, R.; Bartels, T.; Tzschatzsch, H.; Guo, J.; Sack, I.

2025-09-12 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.09.25335388 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMuscle activation is associated with increased tissue stiffness as measured by elastography in diagnostic applications. For this reason, we present ultrasound time-harmonic elastography (THE) applied to the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle during passive tonic vibration reflex (TVR) and active voluntary contraction (VC) stimulation to test whether TVR can serve as a stimulation method for functional assessment of skeletal muscle stiffness. MethodsTwenty-five asymptomatic volunteers (8 females, mean age 34 {+/-} 8 years) underwent five consecutive THE examinations of the VL at three VC loads (15, 22, and 37 N) and during TVR stimulation with 100 Hz frequency and 200 {micro}m (low) and 400 {micro}m (moderate) amplitude. Using standard line-by-line ultrasound, THE acquired the induced shear waves of 60, 70, and 80 Hz frequency with a frame rate of 100 Hz. Shear wave speed (SWS) was reconstructed as a proxy for muscle stiffness and statistically analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and nonparametric Friedman tests. ResultsSWS increased significantly from 1.66{+/-}0.11{square}m/s at rest to 1.79{+/-}0.12{square}m/s, 1.93{+/-}0.13 m/s, and 2.16{+/-}0.12 m/s with 15, 22 and 37 N VC load (p< 10-3). Similar effects were observed during TVR activation with increases to 1.93{+/-}0.13 m/s and 2.18{+/-}0.14 m/s for low and moderate TVR amplitudes (p < 10-3). Increase of SWS at moderate TVR amplitudes correlated with that of 37 N VC load (r = 0.67, p < 10-3). TVR-induced stiffness changes at 100 Hz vibration frequency and moderate amplitude can substitute the more subjective VC forces for muscle function testing. TVR stimulation combined with skeletal-muscle THE may be a useful tool for the routine clinical assessment of stiffness during muscle activation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
3
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%