Back

Muscle activation assessment using ultrasound time-harmonic elastography and tonic vibration reflex

Aghamiry, H. S.; Meyer, T.; Klemmer Chandiaa, S.; Engl, P.; Valli, G.; Wu, Y.; Kurz, E.; Schwesig, R.; Bartels, T.; Tzschatzsch, H.; Guo, J.; Sack, I.

2025-09-12 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.09.25335388 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMuscle activation is associated with increased tissue stiffness as measured by elastography in diagnostic applications. For this reason, we present ultrasound time-harmonic elastography (THE) applied to the vastus lateralis (VL) muscle during passive tonic vibration reflex (TVR) and active voluntary contraction (VC) stimulation to test whether TVR can serve as a stimulation method for functional assessment of skeletal muscle stiffness. MethodsTwenty-five asymptomatic volunteers (8 females, mean age 34 {+/-} 8 years) underwent five consecutive THE examinations of the VL at three VC loads (15, 22, and 37 N) and during TVR stimulation with 100 Hz frequency and 200 {micro}m (low) and 400 {micro}m (moderate) amplitude. Using standard line-by-line ultrasound, THE acquired the induced shear waves of 60, 70, and 80 Hz frequency with a frame rate of 100 Hz. Shear wave speed (SWS) was reconstructed as a proxy for muscle stiffness and statistically analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and nonparametric Friedman tests. ResultsSWS increased significantly from 1.66{+/-}0.11{square}m/s at rest to 1.79{+/-}0.12{square}m/s, 1.93{+/-}0.13 m/s, and 2.16{+/-}0.12 m/s with 15, 22 and 37 N VC load (p< 10-3). Similar effects were observed during TVR activation with increases to 1.93{+/-}0.13 m/s and 2.18{+/-}0.14 m/s for low and moderate TVR amplitudes (p < 10-3). Increase of SWS at moderate TVR amplitudes correlated with that of 37 N VC load (r = 0.67, p < 10-3). TVR-induced stiffness changes at 100 Hz vibration frequency and moderate amplitude can substitute the more subjective VC forces for muscle function testing. TVR stimulation combined with skeletal-muscle THE may be a useful tool for the routine clinical assessment of stiffness during muscle activation.

Published in Journal of Biomechanics (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.6%
Journal of Biomechanics · published here
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
4
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
6
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
7
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
8
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
9
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
10
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
13
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
15
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
18
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Rheumatology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%