Back

A Phase I Study of ASTX727 plus Talazoparib in Patients with Triple Negative or Hormone Resistant/HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Miller, K. D.; Thomas, A.; Althouse, S.; Zang, Y.; Conder, E.; Burgos, R.; Schneider, B. P.; Ballinger, T.; Douglas, E.; Ansley, K.; Jang, H. J.; Chung, W.; Issa, J.-P.; Nephew, K. P.; Rassool, F. V.

2025-09-12 oncology
10.1101/2025.09.09.25335318 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in patients with germline BRCA 1/2 and PALB2 mutations but have been largely ineffective as monotherapy in others. PARP interacts with, and is recruited to, DNA damage sites along with epigenetic factors, such as DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). In addition to increasing PARP-trapping, inhibitors of DNMT modulate ROS-cAMP/PKA signaling and induce a pathogen mimicry, inflammasome signaling response and a BRCAness phenotype that further sensitizes cells to PARPi. In preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies, combined DNMTi + PARPi therapy was effective in both triple negative (TNBC) and hormone resistant (HRBC) models with intact BRCA. MethodsWe conducted a phase I study combining the oral DNMTi ASTX727 with the PARPi talazoparib in patients (pts) with previously treated TNBC or HRBC; pts with deleterious mutations of BRCA were excluded. Pts with TNBC had received at least one prior chemotherapy and pts with HRBC had received prior endocrine therapy with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor for metastatic disease. An ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate organ function was required. A classical 3+3 design guided dose escalation/de-escalation with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia lasting [≥]7 days, or clinically significant grade [≥]3 non-hematologic toxicity in cycle 1; 28 days constituted each cycle. Serial peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were analyzed for changes in methylation using the Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip and LINE1 sequencing. Results34 evaluable pts were enrolled and treated in 8 dose cohorts. Median age was 59 years, 12% identified as Black. Myelosuppression was common with grade [≥]3 neutropenia in 42% and grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia in 13%. DLT was limited to neutropenia. Efficacy was assessed in 29 pts. There were no objective responses, 6 pts had stable disease persisting for > 4 months in 3 pts. LINE1 demethylation ranged from [~]2-10% and immune-specific CpGs (methylation in immune cells) changed 1-5% by differential methylation locus analysis at Day 15. Methylation changes were not dose dependent. ConclusionsASTX727 plus talazoparib produces significant myelosuppression but is otherwise well tolerated. Low dose ASTX727 (10 mg decitabine: 100 mg cedazuridine) on Days 1,3,5 with talazoparib 0.5 mg daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle is recommended for phase II trials. Methylation changes in PBMCs were detected and some heavily pre-treated pts had prolonged stable disease despite the attenuated doses. Statement of Translational RelevanceInhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi) have significant clinical benefit in patients with advanced breast cancer who harbor deleterious mutations of BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 but have had limited benefit in those without mutations. Similarly, epigenetic therapies such as the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) slow disease progression in some hematologic malignancies and myelodysplastic syndromes but have not found a role in solid tumors. Despite limited clinical activity as monotherapy, the combination of PARP and DNMTi significantly inhibited tumor growth in several preclinical models with intact BRCA. In the first clinical trial combining talazoparib and ASTX727, myelosuppression limited drug exposure but the combination was otherwise well tolerated. Strategies to reduce myelosuppression with this combination should be explored. Despite the attenuated doses, methylation changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) and clinical benefit were observed; neither were clearly dose dependent.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
4
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
16
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
27
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%