A Phase I Study of ASTX727 plus Talazoparib in Patients with Triple Negative or Hormone Resistant/HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
Miller, K. D.; Thomas, A.; Althouse, S.; Zang, Y.; Conder, E.; Burgos, R.; Schneider, B. P.; Ballinger, T.; Douglas, E.; Ansley, K.; Jang, H. J.; Chung, W.; Issa, J.-P.; Nephew, K. P.; Rassool, F. V.
Show abstract
BackgroundPoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in patients with germline BRCA 1/2 and PALB2 mutations but have been largely ineffective as monotherapy in others. PARP interacts with, and is recruited to, DNA damage sites along with epigenetic factors, such as DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). In addition to increasing PARP-trapping, inhibitors of DNMT modulate ROS-cAMP/PKA signaling and induce a pathogen mimicry, inflammasome signaling response and a BRCAness phenotype that further sensitizes cells to PARPi. In preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies, combined DNMTi + PARPi therapy was effective in both triple negative (TNBC) and hormone resistant (HRBC) models with intact BRCA. MethodsWe conducted a phase I study combining the oral DNMTi ASTX727 with the PARPi talazoparib in patients (pts) with previously treated TNBC or HRBC; pts with deleterious mutations of BRCA were excluded. Pts with TNBC had received at least one prior chemotherapy and pts with HRBC had received prior endocrine therapy with a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor for metastatic disease. An ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate organ function was required. A classical 3+3 design guided dose escalation/de-escalation with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia lasting [≥]7 days, or clinically significant grade [≥]3 non-hematologic toxicity in cycle 1; 28 days constituted each cycle. Serial peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were analyzed for changes in methylation using the Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip and LINE1 sequencing. Results34 evaluable pts were enrolled and treated in 8 dose cohorts. Median age was 59 years, 12% identified as Black. Myelosuppression was common with grade [≥]3 neutropenia in 42% and grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia in 13%. DLT was limited to neutropenia. Efficacy was assessed in 29 pts. There were no objective responses, 6 pts had stable disease persisting for > 4 months in 3 pts. LINE1 demethylation ranged from [~]2-10% and immune-specific CpGs (methylation in immune cells) changed 1-5% by differential methylation locus analysis at Day 15. Methylation changes were not dose dependent. ConclusionsASTX727 plus talazoparib produces significant myelosuppression but is otherwise well tolerated. Low dose ASTX727 (10 mg decitabine: 100 mg cedazuridine) on Days 1,3,5 with talazoparib 0.5 mg daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle is recommended for phase II trials. Methylation changes in PBMCs were detected and some heavily pre-treated pts had prolonged stable disease despite the attenuated doses. Statement of Translational RelevanceInhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARPi) have significant clinical benefit in patients with advanced breast cancer who harbor deleterious mutations of BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 but have had limited benefit in those without mutations. Similarly, epigenetic therapies such as the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) slow disease progression in some hematologic malignancies and myelodysplastic syndromes but have not found a role in solid tumors. Despite limited clinical activity as monotherapy, the combination of PARP and DNMTi significantly inhibited tumor growth in several preclinical models with intact BRCA. In the first clinical trial combining talazoparib and ASTX727, myelosuppression limited drug exposure but the combination was otherwise well tolerated. Strategies to reduce myelosuppression with this combination should be explored. Despite the attenuated doses, methylation changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) and clinical benefit were observed; neither were clearly dose dependent.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 96%
- A phase I clinical trial of intrahepatic artery delivery of TG6002 in combination with oral 5-fluorocytosine in patients with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer 93%
- Targeting BET Proteins downregulates miR-33a to promote synergy with PIM inhibitors in CMML 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A three gene signature predicts response to selinexor in multiple myeloma 93%
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 93%
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The efficacy of CB-103, a first-in-class transcriptional Notch inhibitor, in preclinical models of breast cancer 93%
- Trends in Phase II trials for cancer therapies 92%
- Differences in durability of PARP inhibition by clinically approved PARP inhibitors: implications for combinations and scheduling 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- 225Ac-labeled CD33-targeting antibody reverses resistance to Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax in acute myeloid leukemia models 94%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 92%
- Compassionate use of recombinant human IL-7-hyFc as a salvage treatment for restoring lymphopenia in patients with recurrent glioblastoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A biomarker of aging, p16, predicts peripheral neuropathy in women receiving adjuvant taxanes for breast cancer 92%
- The search for CDK4/6 inhibitor biomarkers has been hampered by inappropriate proliferation assays 91%
- STING agonism enhances anti-tumor immune responses and therapeutic efficacy of PARP inhibition in BRCA-associated breast cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.