Back

Comparative Analysis of Single-Nucleus and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Human Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells: Methodological Insights and Trade-offs

Ghamsari, R.; de Graaf, C. A.; Thijssen, R.; You, Y.; Lovell, N. H.; Alinejad-Rokny, H.; Ritchie, M. E.

2025-09-09 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.09.08.675012 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) are a heterogeneous pool of hematopoietic progenitors and mature immune cells that collectively sustain hematopoiesis and coordinate immune responses. The bone marrow serves not only as the primary site for blood cell production but also as a niche for various disorders, including blood cancers. Advances in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) have significantly enhanced our understanding of the cellular biology and molecular dynamics within this complex microenvironment. The choice between these two approaches, however, is often shaped or constrained by the study design, such as research objectives, sample type, and preservation conditions. Consequently, methodological differences in library preparation and transcript capture efficiency can introduce systematic biases that complicate downstream analyses and interpretation, underscoring the need to identify and account for method-specific features. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of matched snRNA-seq and scRNA-seq datasets from 11 pairs of healthy donor bone marrow mononuclear cell samples, generated using the popular 10x Genomics platform. We evaluated method-specific biases using multiple quality metrics and compared cell type proportions and transcriptomic signatures captured by each approach. Integrative analysis of these datasets is feasible but not advisable due to systematic gene length biases that were observed between these approaches. Our results showed that despite inherent differences in library complexity, both protocols reliably captured all major cell types. This comparative analysis highlights intrinsic differences between snRNA-seq and scRNA-seq data, providing valuable insights into their respective advantages, limitations, and trade-offs. These findings can assist researchers in selecting the optimal method tailored to specific biological questions and sample characteristics, and also enable more method-aware data analysis and interpretation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
16
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Molecular Omics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
19
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%