Back

Prostate-specific EV capture with sufficient RNA yield to enable transcriptomic profiling

Yang, Y.; Doo, J.; Perez, D.; Franzen, K.; Nguyen, S.; Mirabal, J.; Mitsock, E.; Punnen, S.; Gaston, S.; Gerard, T.; Pollack, A.; Cortizas, E.; Chakrabortty, S. K.; Skog, J.; Johnson, J. M.

2025-09-13 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.09.08.674937 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has reduced prostate cancer (PCa) mortality but suffers from limited specificity, contributing to unnecessary biopsies and overdiagnosis of indolent disease. There is a critical need for biofluid-based biomarkers that improve the precision of PCa detection. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer a promising platform for noninvasive diagnostics, as they carry molecular cargo reflective of their tissue of origin. The ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore (EPI) test, a urine-based EV assay, is currently the only commercial EV diagnostic for clinically significant (cs)PCa, but its performance may be constrained by contamination from renal and bladder-derived EVs. To address this, we developed Exosome Diagnostics Depletion and Enrichment (EDDE), a novel immunocapture-based method for isolating prostate-derived EVs with high specificity. By targeting Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA), we optimized EDDE to selectively enrich prostate EVs from post-DRE urine and recover sufficient RNA for transcriptomic analysis. Throughout development, we implemented a quantitative framework to track EV stoichiometry and assess depletion efficiency and yield, enabling rigorous optimization of the workflow. Our findings demonstrate that PSMA EDDE enriches prostate-specific EVs and yields RNA quantities compatible with sequencing. This platform enhances the specificity of EV-based biomarker discovery and holds promise for determining if tissue-specific EV biomarkers contribute advantages over bulk EVs.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
2
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.4%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
6
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
7
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.3%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
15
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Journal of Extracellular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
20
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%