Back

Impact of Noise on Deep Learning-Based Pseudo-Online Gesture Recognition with High-Density EMG

Taleshi, M.; Yeung, D.; Dinh Trong, M.; Negro, F.; Deny, S.; Vujaklija, I.

2025-09-10 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.09.08.674890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deep neural network (DNN)-based approaches have demonstrated high accuracy in surface electromyography (sEMG)-driven gesture recognition under controlled conditions. However, estimation performance is known to degrade substantially when exposed to perturbations commonly encountered in the real-world. Here, we investigate the impact of typical noises on an autoencoder augmented recurrent neural network gesture estimator driven by engineered features and feature sets. High-density sEMG (HD-sEMG) signals offering rich information particularly suited to DNN-based algorithms were collected from thirteen participants performing wrist movements. Three types of synthetic disturbances were introduced: additive white Gaussian noise (WGN), channel loss, and electrode shift. Results indicate that when using amplitude-based features (specifically, the root mean square value and the mean absolute value), the estimator maintains robust performance under increasing WGN and channel loss, whereas its performance deteriorates markedly with features reflecting signal dynamics and fluctuations, like slope sign changes and zero crossings. Under electrode shift conditions, employing a combined feature set enhances the classifiers resilience. Importantly, the degree of performance degradation depends on both the type and intensity of the noise. These findings confirm the need for noise-resilient architectures in order to achieve practical, everyday sEMG-driven human-machine interfaces. Clinical RelevanceQuantifying the sensitivity of sEMG-based gesture classifiers to noise can help clinicians tailor electrode placement and training and ultimately decrease user frustration and improve the acceptance of assistive devices.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.