Back

Optimized CRISPR/Cas9 Electroporation and Single Cell Cloning Protocol for Generating Pure Cellular Models in Human Immortalized Myoblasts

Rihoux, A.; Gagne, A.; Mezreani, J.; Gonthier-Cummings, C.; Hamilton, L. K.; Samarut, E.; Tetreault, M.

2025-09-08 cell biology
10.1101/2025.09.08.674725 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGenome editing in human skeletal muscle research requires protocols that maximize delivery while preserving viability and clonal outgrowth. We sought to develop a reagent-free workflow for CRISPR/Cas9 editing in human immortalized myoblasts and to demonstrate its performance in two use cases, an IARS1 knockout and an MLIP homozygous knock-in. MethodsWe optimized electroporation parameters using a green fluorescent protein reporter to compare three electrical settings for transfection and survival in E6/E7 myoblasts, then applied ribonucleoprotein delivery for editing. We evaluated the effect of confluency at electroporation, performed single-cell cloning without antibiotics or fluorescence-activated sorting, and validated edits by high-resolution melting pre-screen followed by Sanger sequencing. ResultsElectroporation optimization identified one parameter set that maximized delivery while preserving viability. Performing electroporation at low confluency increased clonal outgrowth and editing rates. The workflow yielded an 84% success rate for IARS1 knockout and a 3.3% success rate for MLIP homozygous knock-in. High-resolution melting provided a very sensitive pre-screen, detecting 96% to 100% of actual edits, reducing the number of Sanger sequencing needed. Performance was reproducible across runs and myoblast lines and increasing single-cell seeding scaled yields without compromising purity. ConclusionsThis work provides a practical and reproducible selection-free protocol that couples electroporation optimization, low confluency editing, single-cell cloning, and high-resolution melting sorting to generate pure edited myoblast lines. The approach is applicable to disease modeling in neuromuscular research and clarifies feasibility boundaries for essential genes and homology-directed repair in these cells.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
3
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
6
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
7
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
13
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
16
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
28
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%