Back

Enhancing Drowning Prevention Efforts in Zambia: A Comprehensive Assessment

Mwale, M.; Mwangilwa, K.; Musokota, S.

2025-09-12 public and global health
10.1101/2025.09.08.25335300 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimThis study examines the drowning prevention landscape in Zambia, identifying challenges, existing initiatives, and opportunities for improvement. Subject and MethodsA convergent mixed methods approach integrated quantitative drowning case data from a WHO structured questionnaire with qualitative insights from structured and open ended responses. Data were collected in 2022 from 10 representatives across government, NGOs, community leadership, and public health expertise, consolidated via a stakeholder workshop. Quantitative data were summarized descriptively, while qualitative data were thematically analyzed to identify key themes, with findings integrated to assess convergence and divergence. ResultsStakeholders identified males, children, youths, water related workers (e.g., fishers), and older adults as high risk groups, with inland water bodies (e.g., Zambezi River, Lake Bangweulu) as primary drowning locations during fishing, transportation, and water collection. Zambia Police reported 89 drowning deaths in 2022 (88.8% male, n=79; 11.2% female, n=10), primarily among individuals aged 30-49 years (n=50). Key barriers to drowning prevention include the absence of a national coordination mechanism, limited implementation of interventions (e.g., swim education, physical barriers), weak enforcement of boating safety laws, and fragmented data systems. National strategies lack specific targets, and no legislation mandates lifeguards or pool fencing. ConclusionA coordinated, multi sectoral approach involving capacity development, stakeholder partnerships, advocacy, and international support is critical to address these gaps and reduce drowning mortality in Zambia.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.