Continuous monitoring of the use of molecular diagnostics in oncology: advancing towards a learning health system
Ebben, K.; Jacobs, F. J. C.; Pasman, R.; Louis - van den Broek, C.; de Kroon, C. D.; van der Wekken, A. J.; Seegers, P. A.; Voorham, Q.; Heidenrijk, E.; van der Werf, J.; van der Flier, S.; Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn - Khosrovani, S.; Ligtenberg, M. J. L.; Kibbelaar, R. E.; de Leng, W. W. J.; Schuuring, E.
Show abstract
Molecular Diagnostics (MDx) is integral to the personalization of cancer treatment, offering both prognostic and predictive insights that inform therapeutic decision-making. However, the rapid advancement of MDx in oncology comes with significant challenges for the development, implementation, and adherence to clinical guidelines. A systematic approach is required to monitor clinical practice, including the utilization of MDx and the evaluation of patient outcomes. Such an approach can facilitate evidence-based updates to clinical guidelines, enhance adherence, and increase transparency in healthcare decision-making. This study aimed to develop a proof-of-principle practice monitor for MDx using two showcases, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and endometrial cancer (EC). Adopting a socio-technical framework, stakeholders were engaged to ensure alignment of the monitors content with clinical needs. Critical clinical questions were identified, and computational decision algorithms were developed based on current guidelines and expert consensus. Nationwide real-world data registries were analyzed to assess the availability, quality, and completeness of data in relation to the clinical questions and decision algorithms. Variables included in decision algorithms were largely present for NSCLC and EC, confirming the feasibility of nationwide monitoring. While some clinical questions could be fully or partially addressed with the available data, many could not. This was due to fragmented data, inconsistent coding practices, and the use of non-standardized free-text entries. Accordingly, this initiative addresses key challenges related to data standardization, computational representation of guidelines, and variability in clinical reporting. With strong national databases and infrastructure already in place, successful implementation now hinges on focused multidisciplinary and multi-organizational collaboration and a learning community to sustain ongoing progress. This approach assessed the feasibility and challenges of continuous evaluation of MDx practice in a proof-of-principle practice monitor, as an important step towards a Learning Health System.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A CDE-based data structure for radiotherapeutic decision-making in breast cancer 94%
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models 94%
- An Ontology-based Approach to Guide and Document Variable and Data Source Selection and Data Integration Process to Support Integrative Data Analysis in Cancer Outcomes Research 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 93%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 93%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 93%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 92%
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Driven Early Detection of Severe Influenza in Jiangsu, China: A Deep Learning Model Validated Through The Design of Multi-Center Clinical Trials and Prospective Real-World Deployment 93%
- Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation 90%
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.