Pathology testing for patients with low back pain in Australian emergency departments

BackgroundImaging in low back pain management is well documented, but little is known about pathology testing in this population. We aimed to describe the profile of patients with low back pain who received pathology testing in emergency departments, and to describe the ordered tests. MethodsA retrospective study of electronic medical records from three emergency departments in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, from January 2016 to October 2021, was undertaken. We included patients diagnosed with a lumbar spine condition at discharge from the emergency department and extracted their demographic and episode of care characteristics. We performed logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex and triage category to identify the factors associated with pathology testing. ResultsPathology tests were ordered in 23.8% of 15 300 episodes of care. Patients who were admitted (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 60.54, 95% CI 52.5, 69.81), stayed longer in the emergency department (aOR 3.76, 95% CI 3.45, 4.10), had a serious pathology (aOR 2.74, 95% CI 2.30, 3.27), or arrived by ambulance (aOR 2.64, 95% CI 2.42, 2.87), were more likely to receive a pathology test than their counterparts. Full blood count, electrolytes, urea, creatinine (EUC), and liver function tests were the most ordered tests. ConclusionsThe characteristics associated with pathology testing were similar to those reported for lumbar imaging in patients with low back pain in previous studies. Our results suggest that guideline recommendations for pathology testing were partly followed, but an investigation into the appropriateness of pathology testing is needed to confirm this hypothesis.