Back

Structured Multimodal Deep Learning improves Genomic Prediction in Future Environments

Potze, A.; van Eeuwijk, F. A.; Athanasiadis, I. N.

2025-09-10 genetics
10.1101/2025.09.05.674546 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of prediction models for phenotypes as functions of genetics and environmental inputs is a long-standing challenge in genetics and plant breeding. Deep neural networks form a promising approach to this task, due to their capacity to approximate nonlinear biological processes. Despite initial expectations, recent studies have found deep neural networks under-performing in comparison to linear methods, even for continent-scale trial datasets. We attribute this to several failure modes of deep learning, including greedy learning, the tendency of deep neural networks to over-emphasize a single type of input data. As a solution, we present the Structured Interaction Neural Network (SINN), which combines statistical decomposition of genetic, environmental and interaction effects with deep neural networks. SINN dissects phenotype prediction into isolated component modeling tasks, revealing poor generalization of learned representations to new environments to be the main limitation for both prediction of genotype-by-environment interactions and yield prediction overall. By balancing model complexity and regularization per component, we reach competitive performance on yield prediction in the next cycle of a maize multi-environment trial, including both new genotypes and new environmental conditions. SINN achieved a higher accuracy (0.63) than BLUP-based methods (0.43) and a neural network from previous literature (0.48), and surpassed the top-performing models in a public benchmark dataset with a lower RMSE (2.41 Mg/ha versus 2.46 Mg/ha, with mean yield of 9.51 Mg/ha) and higher genetic correlation (0.38 versus 0.36). By combining statistical genetics and modern deep learning, SINN enables accurate, modular and scalable genomic prediction in new environments.

Published in GENETICS (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.