Back

Effects of nicotinic receptor antagonism on nicotine and THC self-administration in a model of polysubstance use

Torregrossa, M. M.; Racic, T.; Baglot, S. M.; Stringfield, S.; Hill, M.; Sved, A.

2025-09-11 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.09.05.674477 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMost substance users are polysubstance users; however, little is known about how the combined use of different drugs affects the course of substance use disorder or effectiveness of treatment. Notably, co-use of cannabis and nicotine is very common, and we previously demonstrated that nicotine enhances the self-administration of a synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist and the primary psychoactive phytocannabinoid in cannabis, {Delta}-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). MethodsHere we aimed to further investigate the patterns of nicotine and THC self-administration when available in a concurrent choice model, and to determine the effects of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAchR) antagonists on nicotine-enhanced THC self-administration in male and female rats. ResultsDuring concurrent choice, nicotine availability increased THC self-administration in females without affecting THC metabolism, while THC availability decreased nicotine self-administration and preference in females relative to when nicotine and saline were concurrently available. In females, THC self-administration was reduced by the {beta}2/4 subunit-containing nAchR antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DH{beta}E) in both nicotine and saline concurrent availability groups; while nicotine self-administration was reduced in both sexes by the 7nAchR antagonist methylylcaconitine (MLA), but only in rats that had concurrent access to THC. The nonspecific nAchR antagonist mecamylamine had minimal effects in the concurrent choice model, but it prevented nicotine-induced enhancement of THC self-administration when nicotine was given prior to a single choice THC only self-administration session. ConclusionsThus, behavioral regulation of self-administration is differentially influenced by nAchR subtypes depending on the availability of other substances, which has implications for the efficacy of treatments in the context of polysubstance use. Significance StatementPolysubstance use is extremely common, but very understudied in both clinical and preclinical research. The results presented here highlight that pharmacological modulators of drug reinforcement can differ when multiple drugs are available simultaneously, highlighting the importance of investigating potential treatments for substance use disorders in the context of polysubstance use.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
5
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
7
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
8
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Alcohol
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
20
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%