Back

Placental Abnormalities of Malperfusion, Inflammation, and Meconium Precede Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn

Tsoi, S. M.; Gasper, C.; Maltepe, E.; Chidboy, M. A.; Ozarslan, N.; Blauvelt, C. A.; Buarpung, S.; Cheung, S.; Steurer, M.; Keller, R. L.; Fineman, J. R.; Gaw, S. L.

2025-09-08 pediatrics
10.1101/2025.09.05.25335190 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPersistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is a cause of neonatal hypoxic respiratory failure due to the failed transition of the pulmonary vasculature after birth. Mechanisms of disease are unknown, but we hypothesize they are directly related to insults in the intrauterine environment. The objective was to describe and compare placentas of PPHN infants to understand significant preceding factors from the maternal-fetal environment. MethodsWe conducted a case-control study of mother-infant dyads [&ge;]35 weeks gestation who delivered at a tertiary care center between 2020-2025. Cases were infants diagnosed with PPHN and treated with inhaled nitric oxide; controls were infants without congenital anomalies. Placentas underwent blinded histopathologic review using standardized criteria. Results106 placentas were analyzed (53 PPHN, 53 controls). Placental lesions were significantly more common in PPHN, including maternal vascular malperfusion (30.2% vs 9.4%, p<0.01), fetal vascular malperfusion (34.0% vs 17.0%, p=0.05), placental inflammation (66.0% vs 37.7%, p<0.01), meconium (43.4% vs 15.2%, p<0.01), and chorangiosis (7.6% vs 0%, p=0.04). ConclusionPPHN placentas demonstrate lesions of malperfusion, inflammation, and chronic meconium exposure, suggesting a complex interplay between intrauterine hypoxia and inflammation as a mechanism for the abnormal pulmonary vascular reactivity see in PPHN.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.