A qualitative investigation of young peoples experiences and views of Early Support Hubs
Wright, L.; Griffiths, J.; Appleton, R.; Begum, S.; Clarke, C.; Hunt, N. C.; Lewis, H. K.; Barnett, P.; Bhutta, A.; Driskell, E.; Edbrooke-Childs, J.; Grundy, A.; Hanson, I.; Maynard, E. L.; Mitchell, L.; Saunders, R.; Waite, P.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Trevillion, K.; Johnson, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundYouth is a period of elevated risk for mental ill health, yet young people often do not receive timely support. Barriers can include high clinical thresholds for treatment and long waiting lists, as overstretched statutory services can struggle to meet high demand. The Early Support Hubs available in some parts of England are a potentially promising model to increase access to support. These are community-based services offering open-access, holistic support for 11-25-year-olds without a referral. However, there is no standardised model and considerable variation in the support offered, highlighting the need for research to explore how Early Support Hubs operate, whether they are meeting the mental health and wellbeing needs of young people, and potential areas for improvement. AimsTo explore young peoples experiences of using Early Support Hubs for mental health or wellbeing support, and their views on best practice within these services. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 young people aged 16-25 years, who had used Early Support Hub services across England. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis. ResultsAspects of hubs that were valued by young people included: easy accessibility; holistic approaches which go beyond clinical interventions; a sense of community, friendship and consistency; and youth-led philosophies. Limitations of the hub model included them being little known in local areas, lack of capacity to address more acute and complex mental health needs, and the limited scale of the services. ConclusionEarly Support Hubs appear to be valued by young people and have potential to be an adjunct to clinical services to help increase access to mental health support for young people. Evidence on populations served, what support they receive, and outcomes following support are needed to assess whether there is a policy case for wider roll out.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 97%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 97%
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 98%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 97%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 98%
- “You’re just there, alone in your room with your thoughts” A qualitative study about the impact of lockdown among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 96%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 94%
- Process Evaluation of APPLE-Tree (Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle bEhaviour Change and Technology to build REsiliEnce), a Dementia-Prevention Study focused on Health and Lifestyle changes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 98%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 96%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.