Back

A qualitative investigation of young peoples experiences and views of Early Support Hubs

Wright, L.; Griffiths, J.; Appleton, R.; Begum, S.; Clarke, C.; Hunt, N. C.; Lewis, H. K.; Barnett, P.; Bhutta, A.; Driskell, E.; Edbrooke-Childs, J.; Grundy, A.; Hanson, I.; Maynard, E. L.; Mitchell, L.; Saunders, R.; Waite, P.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Trevillion, K.; Johnson, S.

2025-09-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.09.05.25335175
Show abstract

BackgroundYouth is a period of elevated risk for mental ill health, yet young people often do not receive timely support. Barriers can include high clinical thresholds for treatment and long waiting lists, as overstretched statutory services can struggle to meet high demand. The Early Support Hubs available in some parts of England are a potentially promising model to increase access to support. These are community-based services offering open-access, holistic support for 11-25-year-olds without a referral. However, there is no standardised model and considerable variation in the support offered, highlighting the need for research to explore how Early Support Hubs operate, whether they are meeting the mental health and wellbeing needs of young people, and potential areas for improvement. AimsTo explore young peoples experiences of using Early Support Hubs for mental health or wellbeing support, and their views on best practice within these services. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 young people aged 16-25 years, who had used Early Support Hub services across England. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis. ResultsAspects of hubs that were valued by young people included: easy accessibility; holistic approaches which go beyond clinical interventions; a sense of community, friendship and consistency; and youth-led philosophies. Limitations of the hub model included them being little known in local areas, lack of capacity to address more acute and complex mental health needs, and the limited scale of the services. ConclusionEarly Support Hubs appear to be valued by young people and have potential to be an adjunct to clinical services to help increase access to mental health support for young people. Evidence on populations served, what support they receive, and outcomes following support are needed to assess whether there is a policy case for wider roll out.

Matching journals

1
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 21 published papers
#1
91× avg
2
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
199× avg
3
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 9%
3.3× avg
4
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 46%
11.0%
5
BMC Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 20 published papers
Top 0.1%
91× avg
6
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 0.4%
61× avg
7
BJPsych Open
Royal College of Psychiatrists · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.4%
51× avg
8
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 4%
6.9× avg
10
eClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 55 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
11
Psychological Medicine
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 52 published papers
Top 5%
5.3× avg
12
Psychiatry Research
Elsevier BV · based on 33 published papers
Top 4%
6.8× avg
13
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Cambridge University Press (CUP) · based on 10 published papers
Top 1.0%
21× avg
14
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 12%
2.2× avg
15
Public Health
Elsevier BV · based on 34 published papers
Top 5%
5.5× avg
16
BMJ Mental Health
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
17
JMIR Research Protocols
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
5.6× avg
18
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 22%
0.8%
19
Health Expectations
Wiley · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
20
Journal of Affective Disorders
Elsevier BV · based on 72 published papers
Top 6%
2.0× avg
21
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
7.5× avg
22
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 26%
0.7%