Biomonitoring in the Anthropocene: Urban estuary environmental DNA tracks marine fish, terrestrial wildlife, and human diet
Stoeckle, M. Y.; Ausubel, J.
Show abstract
Managing human impacts in urban estuaries asks for up-to-date monitoring of marine life. Here we analyze vertebrate eDNA in New York Citys East River, a rocky estuary channel difficult to survey with mechanical gear and subject to wastewater discharge. We collected water samples weekly for one year and applied spike-in metabarcoding to quantify vertebrate eDNA. Replication experiments demonstrated good reproducibility above about 10 eDNA copies/PCR. We propose a fish censusing scale based on absolute eDNA abundance. Local marine fish eDNA followed a classic hollow curve species abundance distribution over four orders of magnitude, with abundant and common taxa comprising about 25% of species and 95% of fish eDNA. There was a 10-fold increase in local marine fish eDNA in summer and seasonal differences among taxa consistent with known phenology. Two fish species were newly abundant in comparison to an eDNA survey at the same site in 2016. Levels of other vertebrate eDNA--domesticated animal, non-fish wildlife, and dietary fish--were correlated with human eDNA levels, consistent with a shared wastewater source. Wastewater eDNA identified the commonest urban mammals, land birds, and household pets. Proportions of dietary animal eDNA in wastewater closely approximated proportions in national consumption statistics, opening a window into human diet assessment. Effort and cost for the weekly shoreline survey were modest. Vertebrate eDNA metabarcoding with spike-in quantification enabled weekly monitoring of urban estuary fish populations, identified overlooked newly abundant species, and reported on terrestrial wildlife and human diet.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative PCR assays to detect humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), shortbelly rockfish (Sebastes jordani), and common murre (Uria aalge) in marine water samples 96%
- Scoping the Line Up: A Comparison of Biomonitoring Methodologies for Surf Zone Fish Communities 96%
- Development and validation of versatile species-specific primer assays for eDNA monitoring and authentication of 10 commercially important Peruvian marine species 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seasonal changes in fish eDNA signal vary between contrasting river types 94%
- Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding 94%
- eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine-scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a case study with Amazonian fishes 94%
- Multi-marker DNA metabarcoding detects suites of environmental gradients from an urban harbour 94%
- Environmental DNA survey captures patterns of fish and invertebrate diversity across a tropical seascape 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring 95%
- Fast, Flexible, Feasible: A Transparent Framework for Evaluating eDNA Workflow Trade-offs in Resource-Limited Settings 94%
- In-field genetic stock identification of overwintering coho salmon in the Gulf of Alaska: Evaluation of Nanopore sequencing for remote real-time deployment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and application of eDNA-based tools for the conservation of white-clawed crayfish 94%
- QT-AMP: Quanti-Tray-based amplicon sequencing for simultaneous quantification and identification of enterococci for microbial source tracking 94%
- No evidence for environmental transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 in the UK’s largest urban river system: London as a case study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.