Back

Provincial variability in congenital heart disease prevalence in Argentina, 2014-2019: A population-based analysis from national registry data

Vita, M. C.; Fantozzi, N.; Ortiz, F. M.; Di Lullo, L.; Kokal, R.; Peralta, S.; Di Lalla, S.

2025-09-07 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.09.04.25335135 medRxiv
Show abstract

Congenital heart defects are a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis is essential to enable timely treatment and improve patient outcomes; however, access to early detection and specialized care is unevenly distributed across regions in Argentina. This study describes the prevalence and timing of diagnosis of congenital heart defects and critical congenital heart defects among live births covered by the public health system nationwide. We performed a cross-sectional, descriptive, ecological study including all live births between 2014 and 2019 with a diagnosis of congenital heart defects reported up to five years of age in the National Registry of Congenital Heart Diseases. We calculated prevalence rates and median age at case notification for each province to assess geographic disparities. Out of 2,473,720 live births, 16,150 cases of congenital heart defects (prevalence 65.3 per 10,000 live births) and 3,700 cases of critical congenital heart defects (15.0 per 10,000) were identified. Provincial prevalence ranged widely, from 34.9 to 212.2 per 10,000 for congenital heart defects and from 10.7 to 27.3 per 10,000 for critical cases. The national median age at notification was 75 days for all congenital heart defects and 29 days for critical cases, with notable provincial differences. These findings demonstrate significant provincial variability in both the prevalence of congenital heart defects and the age at which cases are reported to the national health registry. Strengthening early detection efforts and ensuring equitable access to specialized care are crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with these conditions in Argentina and similar settings.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
3
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
7
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
25
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%