Non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Vogt, M.; Helfenberger, N.; Appenzeller-Herzog, C.; Adlbrecht, L.; Hirt, J.
Show abstract
To investigate the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia (YOD) including frontotemporal dementia and their informal caregivers, we conducted a systematic review including randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. We searched bibliographic databases and performed citation and web searches. We found nine trials assessing interventions on education and information or support and counselling that were published between 1990 and 2024 (median sample size: 58). Meta-analyses revealed no statistically significant impact on behavioral outcomes, activities of daily living and quality of life of persons living with YOD and no statistically significant impact on burden, depression and anxiety, and quality of life of informal caregivers. Evidence on the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with YOD and their informal caregivers is limited and inconsistent. Further, larger, and multiple randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions with comparable outcomes, standardized measurements, and longer follow-ups are needed. HIGHLIGHTS- Young-onset dementia (YOD) including frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is challenging for individuals and families. - For education and information interventions, there was no statistically significant impact on behavioral outcomes (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.67; 0.31), activities of daily living (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.45; 0.54) and quality of live (MD -8.93, 95% CI -30.73; 12.86) of persons living with YOD. - For support and counselling interventions, there was no statistically significant impact on burden (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.66; 0.47), depression and anxiety (SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.66; 0.25), and quality of live (SMD -0.56, 95% CI -2.12; 1.00) of informal caregivers.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 95%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- A potential impact of physical distancing on physical and mental health. A rapid narrative umbrella review of meta-analyses on the link between social isolation and health 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 96%
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 95%
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review 94%
- Do Assisted Living Facilities That Offer a Dementia Care Program Differ from Those That Do Not? A Population-Level Cross-Sectional Study in Ontario, Canada 93%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review 91%
- Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a meta-epidemiological study 90%
- Methods used to select results to include in meta-analyses of nutrition research: a meta-research study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.