aiDIVA - Diagnostics of Rare Genetic Diseases Using Large Language Models
Boceck, D.; Laugwitz, L.; Sturm, M.; Bezdan, D.; Gschwind, A.; Haack, T. B.; Ossowski, S.
Show abstract
Genome sequencing (GS) enables the accurate identification of genetic variants in most genomic regions and is rapidly transforming routine diagnostics for rare diseases (RD). While streamlined data generation is scalable, efficient prioritization and correct clinical interpretation of detected alterations remain a challenge, often requiring manual classification by experts with years of training. Hence, there is a need for AI-driven clinical decision support systems that assist clinical experts in identifying causal variants or, in case of large-scale re-analysis of unsolved cases, fully automate the process. To this end, many tools have been developed to estimate the impact of variants on protein function. However, only a small number of tools combine genomic data, variant annotations, and phenotypic data to diagnose cases. Here we introduce aiDIVA, an ensemble-AI featuring a hierarchically organized set of statistical and machine learning models trained on genomic and phenotypic data to identify the causal variant(s) among tens of thousands of genetic variants of a patient. aiDIVA generates pathogenicity classifications for each variant using a random forest AI model and an evidence-based score for dominant and recessive diseases. It combines these predictions with additional clinical metadata to prioritize and rank the most likely causal variants. aiDIVA uses large language models (LLMs) to further improve and explain the results. Finally, the aiDIVA-meta model combines all scores to generate a ranked list of variants. In a benchmark analysis on more than 3,000 diagnostically solved RD patients, the causal variant was included in 97% of the cases among the top-3 candidate variants reported by aiDIVA-meta. Unlike comparative methods, aiDIVA provides interpretable explanations for the best candidates.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Importance of Automation in Genetic Diagnosis: Lessons from Analyzing an Inherited Retinal Degeneration Cohort with the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK) 97%
- Discovering Monogenic Patients with a Confirmed Molecular Diagnosis in Millions of Clinical Notes with MonoMiner 96%
- Genome Alert!: a standardized procedure for genomic variant reinterpretation and automated genotype-phenotype reassessment in clinical routine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- MetaRNN: Differentiating Rare Pathogenic and Rare Benign Missense SNVs and InDels Using Deep Learning 97%
- Genome-wide prediction of pathogenic gain- and loss-of-function variants from ensemble learning of diverse feature set 96%
- A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancing long-read nanopore genome assembly and accurate variant calling for rare disease detection 96%
- Advanced variant classification framework reduces the false positive rate of predicted loss of function (pLoF) variants in population sequencing data 95%
- GA4GH Phenopacket-Driven Characterization of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Mendelian Disorders 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.