Back

The Effect of Image Resolution on the Performance of Deep Learning Algorithms in Detecting Calcaneus Fractures on X-Ray

Yee, N. J.; Taseh, A.; Ghandour, S.; Sirls, E.; Halai, M.; Whyne, C.; DiGiovanni, C. W.; Kwon, J. Y.; Ashkani-Esfahani, S. J.

2025-09-07 orthopedics
10.1101/2025.09.04.25334786 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo evaluate convolutional neural network (CNN) model training strategies that optimize the performance of calcaneus fracture detection on radiographs at different image resolutions. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included foot radiographs from a single hospital between 2015 and 2022 for a total of 1,775 x-ray series (551 fractures; 1,224 without) and was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%). ImageNet pre-trained ResNet models were fine-tuned on the dataset. Three training strategies were evaluated: 1) single size: trained exclusively on 128x128, 256x256, 512x512, 640x640, or 900x900 radiographs (5 model sets); 2) curriculum learning: trained exclusively on 128x128 radiographs then exclusively on 256x256, then 512x512, then 640x640, and finally on 900x900 (5 model sets); and 3) multi-scale augmentation: trained on x-ray images resized along continuous dimensions between 128x128 to 900x900 (1 model set). Inference time and training time were compared. ResultsMulti-scale augmentation trained models achieved the highest average area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of 0.938 [95% CI: 0.936 - 0.939] for a single model across image resolutions compared to the other strategies without prolonging training or inference time. Using the optimal model sets, curriculum learning had the highest sensitivity on in-distribution low-resolution images (85.4% to 90.1%) and on out-of-distribution high-resolution images (78.2% to 89.2%). However, curriculum learning models took significantly longer to train (11.8 [IQR: 11.1-16.4] hours; P<.001). ConclusioWhile 512x512 images worked well for fracture identification, curriculum learning and multi-scale augmentation training strategies algorithmically improved model robustness towards different image resolutions without requiring additional annotated data. Summary statementDifferent deep learning training strategies affect performance in detecting calcaneus fractures on radiographs across in- and out-of-distribution image resolutions, with a multi-scale augmentation strategy conferring the greatest overall performance improvement in a single model. Key pointsO_LITraining strategies addressing differences in radiograph image resolution (or pixel dimensions) could improve deep learning performance. C_LIO_LIThe highest average performance across different image resolutions in a single model was achieved by multi-scale augmentation, where the sampled training dataset is uniformly resized between square resolutions of 128x128 to 900x900. C_LIO_LICompared to model training on a single image resolution, sequentially training on increasingly higher resolution images up to 900x900 (i.e., curriculum learning) resulted in higher fracture detection performance on images resolutions between 128x128 and 2048x2048. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.4%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.7%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.5%
6
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
8
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
26
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
28
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%