Back

Beyond Education and Contraceptive Use: Do Caste, Ethnicity, and Religion Influence Fertility Behavior in Nepal? Evidence from Six Rounds of DHS

Ghimire, D.; KC, S.

2025-09-05 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.09.03.25335049 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundNepal has experienced a significant decline in fertility rates. However, notable variations persist, necessitating further analysis. This study systematically examines the determinants of fertility heterogeneity in Nepal, focusing on caste, ethnicity, religion, and related factors. MethodsThe study analysed data from six rounds of the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (1996-2022) to examine married women aged 15-49. A Poisson regression model was used to assess the relationship between various determinants and the Number of Children Ever Born (CEB). ResultsSignificant associations (p < 0.001) with CEB were identified. Women marrying at age [&ge;]20 experienced a 25% reduction in expected CEB compared to those marrying at [&le;]19. Those with a met need for contraception had a 9.2% lower CEB, while urban women exhibited an 11.1% reduction compared to rural women. Muslim women had an 11.1% higher CEB, whereas Dalit and Janajati women showed lower CEB compared to Arya women. Additionally, women from poorer households had a 9.2% lower CEB, and educational attainment significantly influenced CEB, with post-secondary education linked to a 48.5% reduction in CEB. ConclusionThe study reveals some level of heterogeneity in fertility rates across caste, ethnicity, and religion. It emphasises the importance of female education, family planning, and womens empowerment in reducing fertility rates and suggests that targeted government investments can address these disparities.

Published in BMC Women's Health · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.