Back

From microbes to milestones: Gut bacterial abundances and functional pathways associate with neurodevelopment following preterm birth

Vaher, K.; Kenny, A.; Lusarreta Parga, P.; Jimenez Sanchez, L.; Turner, H.; Smikle, R.; Corrigan, A.; Cruickshank, H.; Rudnicka, M.; Fletcher-Watson, S.; Bogaert, D.; Boardman, J. P.

2025-09-05 pediatrics
10.1101/2025.09.03.25334925 medRxiv
Show abstract

The early life gut microbiome has been suggested to be a potential driver of neurocognitive development. Evidence for this relationship in preterm children, who are at increased risk of both gut microbiome disruptions and neurodevelopmental impairment, is scarce. In a sample of 73 very preterm infants drawn from a prospective birth cohort, we assessed associations between the neonatal gut microbiome and neurodevelopment at 9 months and 2 years. The gut microbiome was profiled from stool samples collected prior to NICU discharge using shotgun metagenomics. By taking a consensus-based analytic approach, we found strong evidence for associations between the abundances of several gut bacterial species and measures related to autistic traits (e.g. Klebsiella spp.), socio-emotional development, including temperament (e.g. Enterobacter cloacae complex, Veillonella parvula), and executive functioning (Clostridium perfringens). The abundances of functional modules involved in gut-brain signalling, particularly those involved in histamine, tryptophan and quinolinic acid metabolism, were associated with measures related to executive functioning and cognitive-behavioural flexibility. This study provides evidence that the neonatal gut microbiome composition may affect longer-term neurodevelopmental profiles following preterm birth, particularly those related to socio-emotional development, autistic traits and executive functioning.

Published in Gut Microbiology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.