Back

Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Emotion Regulation: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Summary of Human Studies

Kang, Y.; Han, K.-M.; Ham, B.-J.; Auer, D. P.; Kaiser, M.; Jung, J.

2025-10-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.09.03.25334438 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEmotion regulation is a core transdiagnostic process in mood, anxiety, and stress-related disorders. While existing non-invasive brain stimulation approaches, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can modulate affective networks, their clinical use is limited by restricted spatial precision and depth penetration. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) offers submillimeter focality and access to both cortical and deep subcortical structures, making it a promising tool for affective neuromodulation. MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO for human studies using tFUS to modulate emotion regulation, affective processing, or related symptoms. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open-label, and within-subject designs. Data on stimulation parameters, target regions, outcomes, and safety were extracted. Effect sizes were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses by clinical domain. ResultsEleven studies met inclusion criteria, targeting the amygdala (n = 5), prefrontal cortex (n = 5), or subcallosal cingulate cortex (n = 1), with protocols varying in frequency (250-650 kHz), duty cycle (0.5-70%), and number of sessions (1-25). Across six studies reporting behavioral symptom outcomes, the pooled effect was moderate-to-large (Hedges g = 0.88, 95% CI [0.47, 1.29]), with larger effects in depression-related measures (g = 1.31) than in anxiety-related measures (g = 0.67). Imaging outcomes were reported in a smaller subset of studies and were not included in the pooled estimates. No serious adverse events were reported. ConclusionstFUS is a safe and well-tolerated intervention capable of engaging deep affective circuits. Future large-scale, harmonized, and mechanistically informed trials are warranted to refine protocols, establish durability, and optimize translation into clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
65.9%
50% of probability mass above
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
4
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
6
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
7
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
10
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
14
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%