Cross-cultural communication in a women's health service: A mixed-methods evaluation
Griffin, G.; Ghannam, S.; Lin, Y. S.; Zaw, M. M.; Mahdavisharif, M.; Ng, S.; Nguyen, T. K. A.; Williams, N.; Javid, N.; Warland, J.; Bradfield, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundEffective communication is critical to safety and quality in healthcare. Women with limited English proficiency face cultural and linguistic barriers to quality communication in anglophone settings, perpetuating poor health outcomes and health inequity. Womens perspectives are essential to inform future evidence-based strategies. This study aimed to evaluate and explore womens experiences of cross-cultural communication within a womens health service. MethodsWomen receiving maternity or gynaecology care at a womens health service in Western Australia were eligible to participate if they had accessed interpretation support in Arabic, Burmese, Farsi, Mandarin or Vietnamese. A total 68 women completed a cross-sectional survey; 15 women participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. Quantitative and qualitative data underwent descriptive statistical and multilingual reflexive thematic analyses respectively. ResultsParticipants reported diverse language preferences and skills, most frequently identifying Mandarin, Arabic and Vietnamese as their preferred language. At their most recent visit, most recalled having an in-person interpreter present speaking their preferred language. However, less than half of participants were provided with written health information resources in their preferred language. Three themes, the role of interpretation, navigating the health service with uncertainty, and a foundation of trust, explore facets of womens experiences, linked by an overarching theme, Health is too important not to understand. ConclusionsThis study highlights the need for proactive service-wide approaches to cross-cultural communication encompassing but not exclusive to, clinical encounters, offering insight into key systemic gaps. Improved integration of interpretation services, language-concordant information resources and language-concordant support for service navigation are recommended. Plain language abstractEffective communication is critical for safety and quality in healthcare. Barriers to cross-cultural communication perpetuate health inequities. This study found that participants experienced inconsistent access to and quality of professional interpretation, provision of language-concordant health information resources was inadequate, and language support was limited to clinical interactions, impeding service navigation. Proactive strategies are recommended to improve service-wide cross-cultural communication not only in clinical encounters, but in womens broader interactions with health services.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing referral to maternity models of care in Australian general practice 98%
- “We felt like part of a production system”: a qualitative study on women’s experience of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland 97%
- Exploring midwives understanding of respectful and non-abusive maternal care in Kumasi, Ghana: Qualitative Inquiry 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- “ She helped from the first minute to the last ” – experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nampula Province, Mozambique 97%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 97%
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 96%
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 96%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 95%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 95%
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mothers’ experiences of using Facebook groups for local breastfeeding support: results of an online survey exploring midwife moderation 97%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 95%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.