Back

Limb Position Effect in Myoelectric Control: Strategies for Optimisation and Standardisation

Overton, T.; Al-Mashhadani, Z.; Raza, S. Y.; Whitson, J.; Rakhshan, M.

2025-09-05 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.09.01.673545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveMyoelectric control uses electromyography (EMG) signals for muscle-machine interfacing with applications in prostheses, augmented/virtual reality, and consumer electronics. However, factors such as changes in the limbs position during activities of daily living reduce the controllers reliability. Therefore, there is a need to develop techniques that reduce this limb position effect to increase the widespread adoption of these technologies. ApproachWe developed an open-source device to standardise myoelectric control experiments. The device has sixteen locations for automatically positioning the participants arms to perform hand gestures or grasp objects, with lights and sensors for guidance and timekeeping. We used this device to collect data from eighteen healthy participants in a five-session study under three modalities: performing five hand gestures with a static or dynamic limb and moving three objects. We recorded forearm electromyography and kinematics of the upper limb and trained a linear discriminant analysis model to assess the classifiers accuracy across different modalities and arm positions. Main resultsThe classifiers accuracy with a static limb was decreased when tested on untrained positions, confirming the limb position effect. More training positions improved accuracy, with four optimally balancing the training burden and classifier accuracy. Classifiers trained with data from dynamic movements outperformed when tested on dynamic data. Furthermore, adding kinematic data to the classifier increased accuracy yet significantly reduced learning rates. However, training with a dynamic limb improved this learning rate. SignificanceThe limb position effect can be countered by training with multiple positions and including kinematic data. Classifiers with EMG and kinematic data should be trained using a dynamic limb to achieve high accuracy with reasonable amounts of training data. Our open-source, automated device will help standardise datasets between laboratories, aiding the further development of robust and widespread myoelectric control.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.8%
3
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
8
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
14
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%