Back

Poultry slaughter and carcass disposal practices in Bangladesh: Piloting the use of killing cones to reduce avian influenza transmission

Baker, M. M.; Chowdhury, K. I. A.; Yeasmin, D.; Kamal, A.-H. M.; Islam, M. T.; Islam, S. S.; Islam, A.; Islam, M. S.

2025-09-03 public and global health
10.1101/2025.08.30.25334525 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mobile poultry vending and slaughtering of sick poultry have been linked to the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 in Bangladesh. However, limited data exist on associated practices and potential interventions to improve biosecurity among mobile poultry vendors. This mixed-method study was conducted in three phases across four sub-districts in Bangladesh. In phase 1, researchers conducted 416 hours of structured observation, 40 in-depth interviews with poultry vendors, and 40 informal interviews with the customers. Phase 2 involved the development and pilot testing of an intervention package, which included poultry slaughtering cones, hand sanitizers, disinfectants, and a hygiene pamphlet, with 10 vendors. Phase 3 implemented the full intervention with 20 vendors, followed by 94 hours of observation and 17 customer interviews. At baseline, vendors sourced poultry from multiple locations, kept them in small cages on rickshaw vans, and slaughtered them in open spaces, drains, or near water sources. Waste was often discarded in the environment or fed to animals. Vendors demonstrated limited hygiene knowledge and were not observed using personal protective equipment, soap, or disinfectants. Post-intervention, vendors adopted improved practices such as using killing cones, containing waste, disinfecting the slaughtering area, and cleaning hands before eating. Customers also viewed the intervention positively. The study highlights significant risks of AIV transmission through mobile poultry vending but demonstrates that low-cost, targeted interventions can enhance hygiene and biosecurity. Further research is needed to assess long-term sustainability and scalability.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
20.0%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
7
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%