Back

Optimized Mappings from Biological Hip Moment Estimates to Exoskeleton Torque can Personalize Assistance Across Users and Generalize Across Tasks

Powell, J. C.; Schonhaut, E. B.; Molinaro, D. D.; Young, A. J.

2025-08-30 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.08.29.671780 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advancements in data-driven methods have enabled real-time estimation of biomechanical states for exoskeleton control. While biological joint moments can be directly used to scale exoskeleton assistance, this approach is often suboptimal. An optimized mapping between biological joint moments and exoskeleton assistance could enhance end-to-end controllers based on the users physiological state. We introduce a flexible parametrization of biological moment-based control using delay, scaling, and shaping terms to transform joint moment estimates into commanded torque. We performed human-in-the-loop optimization, using metabolic cost to evaluate each iterations controller parameters, for 9 subjects across three ambulation modes: level walking at 1.1 m/s, 1.5 m/s, and 5{degrees} inclined walking. We evaluated three methods of exoskeleton control: 1. Personalized/Task Dependent, 2. Task Dependent/Non-personalized, and 3. Task Agnostic/Non-personalized. On average, our personalized approach provided the greatest benefit of 18.3% reduction in metabolic cost compared to walking without the exoskeleton, with the task dependent and task agnostic controllers producing similar reductions of 8.6% and 8.4%, respectively. Our results show that while generalizable, task agnostic control parameters can improve user energetics across cyclic tasks, fully personalized exoskeleton control parameters yield larger metabolic reductions, highlighting the value of personalizing exoskeleton assistance to users across many diverse tasks.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
10
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
15
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
17
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%