Back

Analysis of potential barriers for non-PrEP users among MSM in Germany

Waldorf, H.; Marcus, U.; Iannuzzi, S.; Albrecht, S.; Hoebel, J.; Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer, B.; Bremer, V.; von Kleist, M.; Koppe, U.

2025-09-02 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.08.29.25334713 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDaily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provides effective protection against HIV. Since September 2019, the costs of PrEP have been reimbursed by statutory health insurance in Germany. While a considerable fraction of PrEP-eligible individuals receives PrEP, coverage is inhomogeneous across Germany. This study aims to identify potential barriers associated with PrEP non-use. MethodsBased on the PrApp online cross-sectional study, we analyzed 1,027 PrEP users and 431 non-PrEP users. A PrEP indication was assumed for cis-MSM with an STI diagnosis (12 months), [&ge;] 2 sex partners or sexualized drug use (6 months). Characteristics between PrEP users and PrEP non-users were compared descriptively and using multivariable logistic regression. ResultsNon-PrEP users were more likely to be aged 18-29 years old (P < 0.05) and to use drugs during sex (P < 0.01). The highest PrEP prescriber density (P < 0.01) was associated with PrEP use. Fear of side effects (54.5%) was the most common barrier. Persons with sexualized drug use were more likely to report daily PrEP use as a barrier (34.3% vs. 16.9%, P < 0.01, adjusted P < 0.05). ConclusionsOur analyses indicated structural barriers to PrEP use in federal states with a low HIV-specialists density. For those engaging in sexualized drug use, daily PrEP uptake could potentially be overcome by long-acting PrEP.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.