Leveraging Foundation Models in Maternal and Child Health: A Systematic Review
Mai, X.; Liu, Y.; Chung, P.; Reiss, J. D.; Zhou, S.; Wong, R. J.; Lin, M.; Maric, I.; Sirota, M.; Aghaeepour, N.; Zhang, R.; Stevenson, D. K.; Xie, F.
Show abstract
Maternal and child health (MCH) represents a critical domain requiring accurate, timely, and data-driven decision-making to optimize outcomes from pregnancy through early childhood. Foundation models (FMs) are large pre-trained artificial intelligence models that offer potential for clinical support in diagnostics, medical adherence, and reducing disparities. We conducted a systematic review to identify recent studies leveraging FMs in MCH published between 2020 and 2025. Of 785 studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. FMs demonstrated strong potential to generalize across clinical tasks by integrating multimodal data, including text, electronic health records, imaging, and temporal data to support disease diagnosis, streamline clinical documentation, and generate high-quality medical responses throughout maternal, neonatal, and pediatric care. Moving forward, rigorous validation and close collaboration with clinicians will be essential for the safe, equitable, and effective deployment of FMs in MCH care.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural language processing to evaluate texting conversations between patients and healthcare providers during COVID-19 Home-Based Care in Rwanda at scale 92%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 91%
- Automated identification of abnormal infant movements from smart phone videos 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models for Patient Care: Current Applications and Challenges 94%
- Clinical trial emulation can identify new opportunities to enhance the regulation of drug safety in pregnancy 92%
- Achieving Inclusive Healthcare through Integrating Education and Research with AI and Personalized Curricula 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.