Predicting 10-year Major Adverse Cardiac Events Using Multi-Source Modalities with XGBoost: Establishing a Baseline for Multimodal Fusion in Cardiac Risk Assessment
Gabriel, R. M.; van Assen, M.; Kittisut, N.; Gershon, G.; Yan, X.; De Cecco, C. N.; Adibi, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is critical for long-term cardiovascular risk management. Traditional risk scores offer only moderate performance. Leveraging multi-source data may improve individualized risk stratification. MethodsIn this retrospective study of patients who underwent non-contrast cardiac- gated CT between 2010 and 2023 across Emory-affiliated hospitals, XGBoost models were trained on structured tabular data using sequential feature integration to predict 10-year MACE. Features included coronary artery calcium (CAC), other imaging- derived metrics, clinical risk scores, electrocardiogram parameters, and laboratory biomarkers. Performance was mainly assessed using AUC-ROC and AUC-PRC. A 5- fold cross-validation strategy was employed, repeated across 10 randomized seeds. Statistical significance was evaluated using two-sided t-tests with 95% confidence. ResultsThis retrospective study included 25,514 adult patients (mean age 57 {+/-} 10 years; 57% men), of whom 2.93% experienced MACE within 10 years. The final model incorporating all features, achieved the highest performance with an AUC-ROC of 0.883 {+/-} 0.012, a 30.8% improvement over CAC (0.675 {+/-} 0.015), 28.9%-32.2% over clinical risk scores, with p <0.01 for all. AUC-PRC was 0.289 {+/-} 0.028 compared to 0.056-0.104 for clinical risk scores and 0.067 for CAC. SHAP analysis identified creatinine, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, glomerular filtration rate, and CAC volume as the most influential features. ConclusionSequential integration of structured clinical and imaging-derived data significantly improves MACE prediction. This model establishes a robust and interpretable benchmark for future research in multimodal fusion and cardiovascular risk stratification.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 97%
- AngioNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Vessel Segmentation in X-ray Angiography 95%
- Deep Learning-based Prediction of Early Cerebrovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 96%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 96%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhanced machine learning and hybrid ensemble approaches for coronary heart disease prediction 95%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 94%
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transparent and robust Artificial intelligence-driven Electrocardiogram model for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction 95%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 92%
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.