Back

Real-Time Biometric Monitoring for Cognitive Workload Detection: A Narrative Review of Applications in High-Demand Professions

O'Hara, R. B.; Loftis, S. C.; Rando, C.

2025-08-29 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.08.28.25334668 medRxiv
Show abstract

This narrative review examines the theoretical foundations of mental workload, evaluates biometric monitoring methods, addresses ethical and privacy issues, and highlights future directions for longitudinal research. We focus on the integration of wearable sensors, multimodal data, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML) frameworks to enhance adaptive task scheduling and safety in cognitively demanding professions. Continuous, real-time monitoring through wearable devices and multidimensional data analysis show promise for identifying and managing cognitive overload before it degrades performance. Despite this potential, significant challenges exist, including data protection, sensor reliability, calibration consistency, information processing, network capabilities, and variability in individuals responses. Physiological and behavioral measures as well as subjective and performance indicators offer valuable insights into the early signs of cognitive strain, suggesting that biometric monitoring could help organizations detect performance decline sooner. Evidence shows that these technologies are feasible in professions that require high precision, rapid decision-making, and sustained attention. However, only sparse longitudinal comparisons exist regarding the effectiveness of different biometric tools in real-world operational contexts, particularly with respect to data security and standardization. Integrating physiological and behavioral data with subjective assessments analyzed through AI and ML may enable early warning signs for overload in both individuals and teams working in high-stress, time-critical settings. Such approaches could inform work-recovery cycles, reduce error rates, and sustain cognitive performance. Further empirical research is necessary to confirm sensor accuracy in applied environments and to validate AI and ML predictions before large-scale deployment in sectors such as air traffic control, public safety, healthcare, and industrial operations. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25334668v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (45K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b2c603org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e61f87org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fee11org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@46d485_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
67.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
5
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
9
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%