A Rapid Review of Advance Care Planning Interventions, Strategies, and Communication Approaches in Dementia Care
Phenwan, T.; Anantapong, K.; Sripaew, S.; Kanjanopas, T.; Phalalert, J.; Rahman, A.
Show abstract
Advance care planning is essential for aligning future care with the values and preferences of people living with dementia and their families. Challenges from people with dementias fluctuating mental capacity, gradual decline and healthcare professionals limited advance care planning knowledge and skills remain to enable people with dementia to fully engage with the process; tailored interventions are needed. This rapid review synthesised evidence on advance care planning interventions, communication strategies and health-related outcomes in dementia care. Following Cochranes guidance for rapid reviews, we searched CINAHL, Cochrane Central, PubMed, and Web of Science through May 2025. After duplicate removal, title-abstract and full-text screening were conducted in Covidence with dual independent reviewers. Data extraction and quality assessment, using Joanna Briggs Institute tools, employed a single-reviewer approach with verification by second reviewer. Twenty-five studies from 2015-2025 across 12 countries met inclusion criteria. Included articles were of quantitative designs (n=15), qualitative (n=5) and mixed methods (n=4). Interventions fell into three categories: video as decision aids; web-based tools; and multicomponent programmes combining education, structured discussions, and documentation support for people with dementia, families and healthcare professionals. Primary outcomes consistently showed increased advance care planning uptake. Certain secondary outcomes--carer burden, cost of care, carers sense of competence, hospitalisation rates, quality-adjusted life year, quality of life of people with dementia, rate of burdensome treatments--demonstrated mixed results. Communication strategies identified included embedding relevant theories such as relational autonomy and shared decision-making frameworks for advance care planning process. Study quality ranged from poor (n=8) to high (n=6). Common limitations include small sample sizes, unclear randomisation and allocation processes and limited reflexivity in qualitative research. These findings suggest that contextually tailored advance care planning interventions improve uptake but require standardised outcomes and broader cultural adaptation to comprehensively assess impacts on health outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurse-physician Communication around Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Home Residents 92%
- Effect of a simple exercise programme on hospitalisation-associated disability in older patients: a randomised controlled trial. 89%
- Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older adults: An umbrella review 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Models, components, and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic review of reviews 91%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 91%
- Addressing barriers to interprofessional working with homecare workers in community palliative care: insights from a multi-site qualitative case study in England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study. 95%
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- User Experience Evaluation of Cogscreen for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment: Formative and Summative Evaluation 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 93%
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 93%
- Acceptability of a behavioural intervention to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions in older people with long-term conditions: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How, Why And Under What Circumstances Does A Quality Improvement Collaborative Build Knowledge And Skills In Clinicians Working With People With Dementia? A Realist Informed Process Evaluation 94%
- Exploring the potential of geospatial mapping of emergency call data to improve ambulance services for older adults: a feasibility study in the South Central region of England 92%
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.