Back

Evaluation of a new, community-based screening program to detect hearing loss in adult childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland: Findings from the HEAR study

Joerger, P.; Nigg, C.; Schindera, C.; Zarkovic, M.; Sommer, G.; Kompis, M.; Frahsa, A.; Waespe, N.; Ansari, M.; Kuehni, C. E.

2025-08-29 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.08.28.25334426 medRxiv
Show abstract

2.PurposeChildhood cancer survivors have an increased risk of long-term health complications, including treatment-related hearing loss. Although early detection is important, many adult survivors do not attend hearing screenings in clinical centers because visits can be logistically or emotionally burdensome. The HEAR study tested an alternative, community-based audiological screening option delivered in hearing aid shops in Switzerland. We evaluated its effectiveness, including clinical outcomes and survivor engagement, and developed a plan for potential implementation in clinical practice. MethodsWe invited childhood cancer survivors (CCS) registered in the Childhood Cancer Registry and diagnosed with cancer before age 21 years to a free pure-tone audiogram at hearing aid shops across Switzerland. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire before the hearing test, and two follow-up questionnaires evaluating feasibility and user experience. We gathered qualitative insights through semi structured interviews with participants and hearing aid shop employees, and group discussions with healthcare professionals. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, and group discussions using template analysis. We evaluated the program according to the RE-AIM framework, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data. ResultsOf 1604 invited CCS, 476 (30%) consented and 319 (20%) completed audiometric testing. The program identified clinically relevant hearing loss in 71 participants (22%) using the SIOP-Boston ototoxicity scale. Following the screening, five participants acquired hearing aids. Both CCS participants and clinicians were open to this alternative screening option and provided predominantly positive feedback. Together with clinicians, we developed an implementation plan that outlines how this screening option could be integrated into follow-up care. ConclusionThis simple and accessible community-based screening option could complement existing follow-up care, particularly for CCS who are no longer engaged in structured follow-up care.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.6%
2
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
6
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
9
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
10
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%