Predicting Organ-Specific Toxicity of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators, using Transfer Learning on Graph Convolutional Networks
Kalian, A. D.; Silva, A. C.; Lee, J.; Dorne, J.-L. C.; Potter, C.; Benfenati, E.; Osborne, O. J.; Guo, M.; Hogstrand, C.
Show abstract
Novel Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models were constructed using Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), to predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI), Drug-Induced Renal Injury (DIRI) and Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity (DICT) of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) - an emerging class of performance-enhancing drugs. Prior to training on DILI, DIRI and DICT datasets, the GCN QSAR models were first pre-trained on a variety of unrelated biomedical assay datasets, as an attempt to improve model performance via transfer learning. The success of the transfer learning was mixed; model performances were measurably improved via pre-training on certain datasets, by statistically weak increases. The optimal final QSAR models achieved overall accuracy scores of 68% for DILI (no significant improvement via ensemble modelling), 76% for DIRI (improved to 77% via ensemble modelling) and 65% for DICT (improved to 67% via ensemble modelling). Application of the most optimal singular models to a dataset of 25 SARMs predicted that 21 of the 25 SARMs are either DILI-positive, DIRI-positive, or both - which raises concern, given the rising use of SARMs. All SARMs except for one were predicted as DICT-negative. A novel definition of the Applicability Domain (AD) was used, intended for close relevance to the models, via generating three-dimensional graph embeddings, for each model. Convex hulls were fitted around training data embeddings, with a {+/-}10% buffer, defining the AD as the region of embedded chemical space covered by the convex hull, for a given model. Subsequent analysis found that a majority of DILI, DIRI and DICT testing data lay within the AD, alongside a majority of the SARMs - adding consensus to the reliability of the predictions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PharmaNet: Pharmaceutical discovery with deep recurrent neural networks. 95%
- Deep learning based predictive modeling to screen natural compounds against TNF-alpha for the potential management of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Virtual screening to comprehensive in silico investigation 94%
- Distinguishing classes of neuroactive drugs based on computational physicochemical properties and experimental phenotypic profiling in planarians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benchmarking of Small Molecule Feature Representations for hERG, Nav1.5, and Cav1.2 Cardiotoxicity Prediction 95%
- Advancements in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening through the Synergistic Integration of Graph Neural Networks and Expert-Crafted Descriptors 95%
- Predicting antimicrobial class specificity of small molecules using machine learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell Painting and chemical structure read-across can complement each other for rat acute oral toxicity prediction in chemical early de-risking 96%
- Cannabidiol Toxicity Driven by Hydroxyquinone Formation 91%
- A Method To Calibrate Chemical Agnostic Quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathways On Multiple Chemical Dose-Response Data 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Protein Features and Pathways Responsible for Toxicity using Machine learning, CANDO, and Tox21 datasets: Implications for Predictive Toxicology 95%
- VAE-Sim: a novel molecular similarity measure based on a variational autoencoder 94%
- Why Ortho- and Para-Hydroxy Metabolites Can Scavenge Free Radicals That the Parent Atorvastatin Cannot? Important Pharmacologic Insight from Quantum Chemistry 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.