Sex differences in personal and work-related factors associated with impaired mental well-being among Swiss General Internal Medicine physicians
Egger, I.; Nater, C.; Streit, S.; Moor, J.
Show abstract
Introduction and aimsPhysicians are at risk for impaired mental health. In Switzerland, a lack of understanding of personal and workplace-related factors contributing to impaired physician well-being in women and men hinders the design of effective strategies to improve mental health of the healthcare workforce. In the present work, we focused on physicians of the General Internal Medicine (GIM) workforce and aimed to sex-specifically assess factors associated with a pathological physician well-being index. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study using an online survey distributed by the Swiss GIM physician societys newsletter, a journal advertisement, and by clinics. Participants completed the survey between December 2021 and April 2022 and responded to questionnaires assessing personal and workplace-related topics as well as demographic data. The main outcome was the physician well-being index used as a binary variable (pathological vs. normal), and the exposures of interest were different personal and workplace-related factors that may be important for men or women among the GIM physician workforce. We used Chi-squared test to determine sex differences among the physicians with impaired well-being, and we established univariable and multivariable logistic regression models in the whole population of participants and in sex strata order to determine factors associated with impaired physician well-being. ResultsThis analysis comprised 682 physicians, among them 278 (41%) men and 404 (59%) women. Participants mean age was 37 {+/-} 11 years (mean {+/-} standard deviation [SD]). Most participants lived in German-speaking Switzerland (n=485, 71%) and worked in non- academic hospitals (n=267, 39%) and academic hospitals (n=257, 38%). Overall, 18% showed an impaired mental well-being, with little evidence for a sex difference (15% among women vs. 19% among men; p=0.18). Logistic regression analyses revealed some associations between physician well-being and personal factors such as residing in the German-speaking region of Switzerland. Interesting sex-specific associations with parameters of workplace inclusiveness emerged. In fact, sex-stratified analyses revealed that mens better well-being was associated with greater support by their spouse, whereas womens well-being is vulnerable to experiences of gender-related discrimination as well as workplace-related conflicts regarding pregnancy and motherhood. ConclusionOverall, the present data revealed that mostly workplace-related factors are associated with impaired physician well-being, particularly in women. For men physicians, personal factors such as the support by their partners was key. Knowledge on the impact that workplace parameters have on well-being is the critical first step that can inform strategies aimed at improving equal opportunities for mental health and career success among women and men in General Internal Medicine and to ultimately help prevent attrition from the healthcare workforce.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Mental health and burnout during medical school: Longitudinal evolution and covariates 94%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The managerial role and psychosocial factors of job satisfaction: a cross-sectional study among Wittyfit’s users 95%
- On the frontlines in Shanghai: Stress, burnout and perceived benefit among COVID-19 testers and other personnel during the Omicron wave lockdown 94%
- A cross-sectional study of the mismatch between telecommuting preference and frequency associated with psychological distress among Japanese workers in the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Migrant healthcare workers during COVID-19: bringing an intersectional health system-related approach into pandemic protection. A German case study 94%
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions and medically approved COVID-19 infection risk: understanding the mental health dimension of the pandemic. A German hospital case study 94%
- Socio-economic determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infection: results from a population-based serosurvey in Geneva, Switzerland 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between work situation and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective cohort study in Norway 94%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
- Factors Associated with Mental Health Outcomes in Oman during COVID19: Frontline vs Non-frontline Healthcare Workers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective cohort study of socioeconomic status and subsequent unemployment under COVID-19 in Japan 92%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
- Effect of working from home on the association between job demands and psychological distress 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.