Back

Determination of maximal oxygen uptake in adolescents

Jalanko, P.; Laitinen, E.; Vlachopoulos, D.; Gao, Y.; Barker, A. A.; Bond, B.; Lee, E.; Haapala, E. A.

2025-08-28 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.08.27.25334536 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAn oxygen uptake ([V]O2) plateau, despite an increased work rate, is considered the gold standard for confirming if exercise test performance reflects maximal oxygen uptake ([V]O2max). We investigated whether adolescents demonstrate a [V]O2 plateau during an incremental test or if a supramaximal verification phase is necessary to confirm [V]O2max. We also investigated the impact of using moving versus binned time averages on [V]O2max values, and how these processing strategies influence the interpretation of the verification phase in confirming [V]O2max. MethodsA total of 27 adolescents (16 girls) aged 12 to 14 years completed an incremental cycle ergometer ramp test to exhaustion. After a 15-minute recovery, a verification phase was conducted at 105% of their incremental test peak power. [V]O2max was analysed using 15-second binned and moving averages. ResultsOut of 27 participants, 5 (19%) demonstrated a plateau in [V]O2 during an incremental test. [V]O2max was confirmed in the verification phase for 23 out of the 27 adolescents (85%). The moving [V]O2max (mL/kg/min) averages were higher than the binned [V]O2 values in the incremental test (1.8%) and the verification phase (2.4%) (P<0.0001). Processing strategies did not affect the confirmation of [V]O2max. ConclusionA verification phase is necessary for accurately determining [V]O2max in adolescents, who often do not reach a [V]O2 plateau. The processing strategies of exercise tests should be reported, as different strategies can lead to variations in [V]O2max results. However, these processing strategies do not impact the utility of the verification test.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.