Back

Implementing Home-Based Digital Health in Rural Canada: A Scoping Review

Lai, J.; Saleh-Singh, A.; Olisaekee, G.

2025-08-28 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.08.27.25334390 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis scoping review maps the current evidence on implementing home-based digital health technologies in rural Canada. It examines available readiness tools and indicators, stakeholder perspectives, barriers, and outcomes to provide evidence-based insights for successful implementation. MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus between February and March 2025. Eligible studies focused on patient-facing, home-based digital health technologies in rural or remote Canadian contexts. Articles addressing pre-implementation, implementation, or adoption of home-based digital health solutions were also included. Data extraction and thematic analysis were performed to synthesize findings. ResultsSixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning diverse rural regions of British Columbia, Ontario, and several Prairie and Atlantic provinces. Findings were categorized under four major themes: (1) readiness tools, frameworks, and indicators; (2) patient and provider perspectives; (3) barriers and corresponding strategies; and (4) outcomes and impacts of home-based digital health implementation in rural Canada. While patients and providers are generally positive towards home-based digital health technologies, several context-dependent factors influence their success. Key barriers include digital divides, infrastructure limitations, and varying digital literacy. Effective implementation necessitates addressing these challenges through tailored strategies, such as culturally sensitive design, infrastructure development, digital literacy training, and community engagement. ConclusionAlthough home-based digital health technologies have the potential to improve healthcare access and outcomes in rural Canada. Successful implementation requires careful consideration of contextual factors, proactive barrier mitigation, and a focus on co-design with users to ensure equitable access and outcomes.

Published in Frontiers in Digital Health (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.