Formalizing biodiversity measures and guiding through them
Pavoine, S.
Show abstract
Facing the myriad of indices claimed to be biodiversity indices that have been proposed by the scientific community, it becomes critical to analyze the mathematical properties that determine whether any index respond to biological necessities about biodiversity quantification. In ecology, species richness, the number of species, was a pioneer simple formula still currently most widely used as a biodiversity index. Species, functional, phylogenetic diversity indices then emerged from the feeling that combining species richness with the distribution of species abundances, functional and/or phylogenetic characteristics could provide indices that are more linked to ecological phenomena than species richness alone. Although there are theoretically an infinite number of potential biodiversity indices, I show here that some widely used indices of biodiversity actually take on large values in the absence of diversity. I thus claim for stricter definition of mathematical formulas that can be classified as biodiversity indices and for the use of parametric guiding indices that generalize and connect existing indices, tracing paths through the jungle of indices. As a case study I develop a parametric guiding index, and applying it on bat diversity, I show that analyzing the mathematical properties of potential biodiversity indices is critical to evaluate their relevance as regards a study objective in ecology. I come to the conclusions that to improve applications of biodiversity indices in ecology we need to: stop claiming for a single best formula; acknowledge that biodiversity indices are above all diversity indices, with the particularity that they are applied to biological data; agree on a set of minimal conditions that any biodiversity index must fulfill; integrate a large panel of diversity indices in software packages to enable ecologists to select and apply the most relevant index for their study. I propose a set of minimal conditions as a first step in this direction.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of mimicry on extinction risk in Aculeata: a theoretical approach. 92%
- Effects of adaptive harvesting on fishing down processes and resilience changes in predator-prey and tritrophic systems 91%
- Beyond variance: simple random distributions are not a good proxy for intraspecific variability in systems with environmental structure 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Hidden Side Of Diversity: Effects Of Imperfect Detection On Multiple Dimensions Of Biodiversity 93%
- A user-friendly guide to using distance measures to compare time series in ecology. 93%
- Degrees of compositional shift in tree communities vary along a gradient of temperature change rates over one decade: Application of an individual-based temporal beta diversity concept 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.