Back

Integration of Digital Histology and Gene Expression to Predict Treatment-Specific Responses in Breast Cancer

Howard, F. M.; Dolezal, J. M.; Hieromnimon, H. M.; Venters, S.; Kochanny, S. E.; Li, A.; Borowsky, A. D.; Symmans, W. F.; Wolf, D.; Brown-Swigart, L.; Sun, A.; Basu, A.; Hirst, G. L.; Nguyen, L. C.; Asare, A.; Kanaparthi, S.; Khramtsova, G. F.; Blenman, K. R. M.; Shan, N. L.; Fan, C.; Tolaney, S. M.; Somlo, G.; Hudis, C. A.; Sikov, W. M.; McCart, L. M.; Watson, M. A.; Carey, L. A.; Stover, D. G.; van't Veer, L. J.; Esserman, L. J.; Perou, C. M.; Pusztai, L.; Olopade, O. I.; Huo, D.; Nanda, R.; Pearson, A. T.

2025-08-27 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.25.25334393 medRxiv
Show abstract

Deep learning models applied to digital histology can predict gene expression signatures (GES) and offer a low-cost, rapidly available alternative to molecular testing at the time of diagnosis. We optimized transformer-based models to infer GES results and applied this approach to pre-treatment H&E-stained biopsies from 1,940 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinical trial and real-world cohorts. The most predictive histology-derived GES for pathologic complete response (pCR) in the I-SPY2 trial was validated in four external cohorts: CALGB 40601, CALGB 40603, a trial of durvalumab plus CT, and standard-of-care CT-treated patients from the University of Chicago. Among HER2-negative patients, a transformer-based model trained using a signature composed of estrogen-regulated genes, proliferation, apoptosis, and interferon response genes predicted pCR with an AUC of 0.794, outperforming models based on clinical features alone (AUC 0.704, p = 0.001), pathologist TIL assessment, and a model trained directly to predict response from I-SPY2 cases. Tertiles of this signature stratify patients into clinically relevant groups with increasing likelihood of complete response, with pCR rates [≥]50% in the top tertile regardless of treatment or hormone receptor status. Additional transformer-based signature models predicted response to specific therapies (but not chemotherapy alone), including a HER2 signaling signature in IO-treated patients, and a claudin-low signature in bevacizumab treated patients. In HER2- cohorts with available gene expression data and histology, models trained on expression data performed similarly to digital histology predictions, but the combination of gene expression and histology outperformed histology alone. These findings suggest that histology-based GES provides additive information to RNA sequencing data and can inform precision treatment selection across breast cancer subtypes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.6%
2
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
3
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
6
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
9
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
13
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
18
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%