Privacy concerns regarding personal health information in Myanmar: A cross-sectional survey in a least developed country
Htwe, K. Z. Z.; Lawpoolsri, S.; Soonthornworasiri, N.; Thammawijaya, P.; Kaewkungwal, J.
Show abstract
Protecting personal health information has long been a key ethical concern in healthcare. With the rise of digital health systems, privacy concerns have intensified. In least developed countries like Myanmar, where digital literacy is low, public and governmental awareness of privacy issues is limited, and data protection laws are lacking, the health information privacy area remains largely unaddressed and understudied. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the extent of privacy concerns related to personal health information in Myanmar and identify the factors associated with these concerns. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to May 2024 among 424 participants recruited online and through two private clinics. A validated 21-item scale measuring six domains: Collection, Errors, Unauthorized Secondary Use, Improper Access, Control, and Awareness, was used. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the scale, and logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the concerns. Among the 424 participants, 77.83% reported high concerns. The highest concern was observed in the Awareness domain (mean 5.02, SD 1.65), while the Collection domain showed the lowest (mean 3.41, SD 1.44). Participants aged 45 years or older had significantly lower odds of high concerns compared to those aged 18-24 years, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.29 (95% CI 0.09-0.88). In contrast, those reporting good health (aOR 3.72, 95% CI 1.69-8.23) and high health concerns (aOR 5.26, 95% CI 3.02-9.45) had increased odds of high privacy concerns. These findings highlight the need for robust privacy safeguards, legal frameworks, and trust-building measures to support Myanmars transition to digital health systems. They also provide insights relevant for other least developed countries facing similar challenges in balancing digital innovation with the protection of personal health information. Author SummaryWe examined the extent of personal health information privacy concerns of people in Myanmar at a time when digital health tools are growing but legal protections and public awareness remain limited. From March to May 2024, we surveyed 424 adults online and in two private clinics. We asked about six kinds of concerns, related to the amount of personal health information collected, errors in the information, who can access the information, whether they are reused without permission, how much control people have over their own information, and how clearly rules are explained. More than three in four participants reported high overall concern. People were more worried about not knowing how their information would be used, and least worried about the act of collection itself. Older adults tended to be less concerned than younger adults, while those who felt in good health and those who were more worried about their health showed greater concern. Patterns also varied by sex, place of residence, type of occupation, and familiarity with electronic medical records. Our findings point to practical steps for Myanmars digital health transition: communicate clearly about data practices, give people meaningful control, prevent misuse and improper access, and strengthen organizational and legal safeguards. These actions can build trust and support safe, more equitable health information systems in Myanmar and in similar settings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 95%
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: a nationwide cross-sectional study 95%
- Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 95%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 94%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 95%
- Predicting public take-up of digital contact tracing during the COVID-19 crisis: Results of a national survey 94%
- The Lifecycle of Electronic Health Record Data in HIV-Related Big Data Studies: A Qualitative Study of Instances of and Potential Opportunities to Minimize Bias 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Toward Using Twitter for PrEP-Related Interventions: An Automated Natural Language Processing Pipeline for Identifying Gay or Bisexual Men in the United States 91%
- Initial Experience in Predicting the Risk of Hospitalization of 496 Outpatients with COVID-19 Using a Telemedicine Risk Assessment Tool 91%
- The relationship between demographic, psychosocial and health-related parameters and the impact of COVID-19: a study of twenty-four Indian regions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 94%
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 93%
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.