Quantitative Analysis of Breast Nuclei Morphology for Cancer Diagnosis Using Supervised Machine Learning
Attique, Z.; Khan, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide and a major cause of mortality. Early and accurate detection is vital for improving outcomes, yet conventional diagnostic approaches such as mammography, histopathology, and fine-needle aspirate (FNA) cytology can be limited by observer variability and overlapping morphological features. Machine learning (ML) offers a means to improve diagnostic accuracy by capturing subtle patterns in complex datasets. MethodsThis study employed the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnostic (WBCD) dataset, comprising 569 FNA cytology cases with 30 quantitative nuclear morphology features. After correlation analysis, 11 predictors were selected to reduce redundancy while retaining diagnostic power. The dataset was split into training and testing sets using an 85:15 stratified approach. Four supervised classifiers were implemented in Pythons scikit-learn library: Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). Models were tuned using GridSearchCV and evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and confusion matrices. ResultsExploratory analysis showed malignant tumors exhibited larger nuclear size and higher concavity features than benign tumors. The MLP achieved the best performance (accuracy 0.95, recall 0.91, precision 0.96), misclassifying only two malignant cases. RF and KNN both reached 0.93 accuracy and 0.97 precision but had lower recall (0.85). SVC achieved perfect precision (1.00) but the lowest recall (0.76), misclassifying eight malignant cases. ConclusionML models demonstrated reliable classification of breast tumors from cytomorphological features, with the MLP offering the most favorable balance of sensitivity and specificity. These findings highlight the clinical potential of neural network-based models to support early and accurate breast cancer detection.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 95%
- The NILS study protocol - a retrospective validation study of a preoperative decision-making tool for non-invasive lymph node staging in women with primary breast cancer [ISRCTN14341750] 93%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 96%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 93%
- ChatGPT-Enhanced ROC Analysis (CERA): A Shiny Web Tool for Finding Optimal Cutoff in Biomarker Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- piNET: An Automated Proliferation Index Calculator Framework for Ki67 Breast Cancer Images 94%
- From Variability to Standardization: The Impact of Breast Density on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and the Need for a Structured Reporting System 93%
- Breast invasive ductal carcinoma classification on whole slide images with weakly-supervised and transfer learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment 94%
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 93%
- VISTA: Virtual ImmunoSTAining for pancreatic disease quantification in murine cohorts 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.