Back

Quantitative Analysis of Breast Nuclei Morphology for Cancer Diagnosis Using Supervised Machine Learning

Attique, Z.; Khan, S.

2025-08-26 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.24.25334307 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide and a major cause of mortality. Early and accurate detection is vital for improving outcomes, yet conventional diagnostic approaches such as mammography, histopathology, and fine-needle aspirate (FNA) cytology can be limited by observer variability and overlapping morphological features. Machine learning (ML) offers a means to improve diagnostic accuracy by capturing subtle patterns in complex datasets. MethodsThis study employed the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnostic (WBCD) dataset, comprising 569 FNA cytology cases with 30 quantitative nuclear morphology features. After correlation analysis, 11 predictors were selected to reduce redundancy while retaining diagnostic power. The dataset was split into training and testing sets using an 85:15 stratified approach. Four supervised classifiers were implemented in Pythons scikit-learn library: Random Forest (RF), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC). Models were tuned using GridSearchCV and evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and confusion matrices. ResultsExploratory analysis showed malignant tumors exhibited larger nuclear size and higher concavity features than benign tumors. The MLP achieved the best performance (accuracy 0.95, recall 0.91, precision 0.96), misclassifying only two malignant cases. RF and KNN both reached 0.93 accuracy and 0.97 precision but had lower recall (0.85). SVC achieved perfect precision (1.00) but the lowest recall (0.76), misclassifying eight malignant cases. ConclusionML models demonstrated reliable classification of breast tumors from cytomorphological features, with the MLP offering the most favorable balance of sensitivity and specificity. These findings highlight the clinical potential of neural network-based models to support early and accurate breast cancer detection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.