Back

Care Fragmentation and Outpatient Imaging Utilization and Expenditures in U.S. Adults: A MEPS 2020 Study

Bouras, A.; Patel, D.

2025-08-27 public and global health
10.1101/2025.08.23.25334292 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCare fragmentation has been linked to overuse and higher costs. Evidence on how fragmentation relates to outpatient imaging in the general U.S. population remains limited. ObjectiveTo quantify the association between care fragmentation and outpatient imaging utilization and radiology expenditures among U.S. adults, and to test whether associations differ by multimorbidity and insurance. DesignCross-sectional, survey-weighted analysis using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2020. ParticipantsAdults aged[≥] 18 years in MEPS 2020 with non-missing survey design variables. ExposuresCare fragmentation category (None/Low/Medium/High), defined using person-level utilization breadth and intensity from the Full-Year Consolidated file. Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes included any advanced imaging (receipt of at least one MRI, CT, or ultrasound during office-based visits) and total radiology expenditures (sum of payments for imaging-flagged office-based visits). Secondary outcomes included any imaging, imaging visit count, and radiology spending as a proportion of total expenditures. ResultsIn survey-weighted models (reference = Low; "None" excluded from regressions), Medium fragmentation was associated with higher odds of any advanced imaging (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.23-1.64), whereas High did not further increase the probability (OR 0.92, 0.71-1.19). Fragmentation substantially increased intensity: imaging visit counts (RR 2.51 Medium; 3.96 High vs Low) and radiology spending among spenders (2.36x Medium; 3.96x High vs Low). Older age (50-64, 65+), female sex, and Medicare coverage independently raised both imaging probability and spend. ConclusionsCare fragmentation is associated with both increased probability and intensity of advanced imaging utilization, with particularly strong effects on radiology expenditures among adults with positive spending. Findings support targeted interventions to improve care coordination and reduce potentially unnecessary imaging in fragmented care environments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
5
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
12
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%