Care Fragmentation and Outpatient Imaging Utilization and Expenditures in U.S. Adults: A MEPS 2020 Study
Bouras, A.; Patel, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundCare fragmentation has been linked to overuse and higher costs. Evidence on how fragmentation relates to outpatient imaging in the general U.S. population remains limited. ObjectiveTo quantify the association between care fragmentation and outpatient imaging utilization and radiology expenditures among U.S. adults, and to test whether associations differ by multimorbidity and insurance. DesignCross-sectional, survey-weighted analysis using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2020. ParticipantsAdults aged[≥] 18 years in MEPS 2020 with non-missing survey design variables. ExposuresCare fragmentation category (None/Low/Medium/High), defined using person-level utilization breadth and intensity from the Full-Year Consolidated file. Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes included any advanced imaging (receipt of at least one MRI, CT, or ultrasound during office-based visits) and total radiology expenditures (sum of payments for imaging-flagged office-based visits). Secondary outcomes included any imaging, imaging visit count, and radiology spending as a proportion of total expenditures. ResultsIn survey-weighted models (reference = Low; "None" excluded from regressions), Medium fragmentation was associated with higher odds of any advanced imaging (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.23-1.64), whereas High did not further increase the probability (OR 0.92, 0.71-1.19). Fragmentation substantially increased intensity: imaging visit counts (RR 2.51 Medium; 3.96 High vs Low) and radiology spending among spenders (2.36x Medium; 3.96x High vs Low). Older age (50-64, 65+), female sex, and Medicare coverage independently raised both imaging probability and spend. ConclusionsCare fragmentation is associated with both increased probability and intensity of advanced imaging utilization, with particularly strong effects on radiology expenditures among adults with positive spending. Findings support targeted interventions to improve care coordination and reduce potentially unnecessary imaging in fragmented care environments.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in patient attachment to an aging primary care workforce: a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada 92%
- Clinical, Behavioral and Social Factors Associated with Racial Disparities in Hospitalized and Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients from an Integrated Health Care System in Georgia 91%
- Methodological Considerations for Linking Household and Healthcare Provider Data for Estimating Effective Coverage: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 91%
- The Economic Burden of KCNT1-Related Disorders in the United States: Insights from Caregiver-Reported and EMR-Derived Data 89%
- Balancing revenue generation with capacity generation: Case distribution, financial impact and hospital capacity changes from cancelling or resuming elective surgeries in the US during COVID-19 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 92%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 91%
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.