Back

Trabectedin in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Real-world Data on Effectiveness, Safety, and Financial Implications from a European Comprehensive Cancer Centre

Giraud, J.-S.; Watson, S.; Acramel, A.; Laurence, V.; Tzanis, D.; Bonvalot, S.; El Zein, S.; Nicolas, N.; Cros, C.; Desmaris, R.; Bonnet, C.

2025-08-27 oncology
10.1101/2025.08.22.25334220 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSoft tissue sarcomas (STS) comprise over 150 histological subtypes, with advanced cases showing poor prognosis (5-year survival <10%). Trabectedin, a synthetic alkaloid, is frequently used after anthracycline-based chemotherapy failure. Despite the withdrawal of reimbursement in France in 2018 due to debated efficacy and safety, it remains in clinical use, imposing financial strain on hospitals. MethodsThis retrospective single-center study evaluated trabectedins efficacy, safety, and cost in 68 patients treated between 2019 and 2023. ResultsL-sarcomas accounted for 78% of cases, including uterine leiomyosarcomas (n=16), soft-tissue leiomyosarcomas (n=17), and myxoid liposarcomas (n=8). Non-L-sarcomas (22%) included mostly synovial sarcomas. The overall disease control rate was 71%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.1 months. Subtype-specific median PFS was 6.8 months for liposarcomas (11.3 for myxoid vs. 4.5 for other subtypes), 3.1 months for leiomyosarcomas (3.4 months for uterine vs 3.1 for soft-tissue), and 2.4 months for non-L-sarcomas. Patients received a median of 5 cycles (range: 1-38), with an average total dose of 16 mg [2 - 81], and an average hospital cost of {euro}9,900. Adverse events occurred in 91%, mainly hematological; cardiac toxicity was seen in 9%. ConclusionDespite limited reimbursement, trabectedin remains a relevant treatment, particularly in L-sarcoma management.

Published in International Journal of Cancer (predicted rank #20) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
4
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
7
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
11
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
International Journal of Cancer · published here
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
27
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%