Under the Microscope: Formaldehyde Inhalation Exposure in NHS Pathology Departments
Plesa, M.; Yates, R. L.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThe United States Environmental Protection Agency has determined that formaldehyde presents an "unreasonable risk of injury to human health." Occupational inhalation exposure is associated with short- and long-term damage to the respiratory, female reproductive, and nervous systems, and is also carcinogenic. The European Union (EU) has recently introduced formaldehyde workplace exposure limits (WELs) that are lower (long-term: 0.3ppm; short-term: 0.6ppm) than those currently applied in the United Kingdom (UK) (long-term: 2ppm; short-term: 2ppm). UK regulation additionally requires exposure to carcinogens to be reduced to as low as is reasonably practicable. We evaluated formaldehyde airborne concentrations in National Health Service (NHS) cell pathology departments to assess the adequacy of exposure controls. MethodsUsing the Freedom of Information Act (2000), we requested 12 months (2024-2025) of formaldehyde airborne monitoring data collected by cell pathology departments across n=122 NHS Trusts in England (n=102), Scotland (n=10), Wales (n=6), and Northern Ireland (n=4). Results were evaluated empirically and using EN 689:2018 statistical methods to assess exposure variability, estimate upper-bound concentrations, and determine the likelihood of adequate exposure control when benchmarked against EU WELs. ResultsA total of 1,715,516 formaldehyde airborne monitoring results were disclosed by n=117 cell pathology departments. Monitoring was infrequent, with 73% of sites measuring formaldehyde airborne concentrations once weekly or less. EU long-term WELs were exceeded regularly at 70% of sites (95th percentile >0.3 ppm), and EU short-term WELs were exceeded regularly at 43% of sites (95th percentile >0.6 ppm). The 95th percentile upper tolerance limit (UTL95,70) exceeded the EU short-term WEL at 68% of sites. Only 11% and 17% of departments demonstrated frequent (once daily or more) formaldehyde airborne monitoring with 95th percentiles below the EU long- and short-term WELs, respectively. ConclusionsFormaldehyde exposure is infrequently monitored and inadequately controlled in NHS cell pathology departments. What is already knownA substantial body of occupational exposure data shows that formaldehyde inhalation is associated with myriad short- and long-term deleterious health effects on the respiratory, female reproductive, and nervous systems. It is also a human carcinogen. Pathology departments are amongst the riskiest occupational environments for formaldehyde inhalation exposure and therefore require a high standard of governance and infrastructure to adequately protect staff. What this study addsWe show that formaldehyde airborne concentrations in most NHS cell pathology departments are monitored infrequently and regularly exceed EU WELs. Our data raises concern for the health of thousands of NHS employees working in these environments. How this study might affect research, practice, or policyUrgent national regulatory intervention is now warranted to improve the occupational hygiene of NHS cell pathology departments. This will require a combination of upgraded infrastructure, more regular personal exposure monitoring, better employee education on basic lab practice and occupational health risks, improved access to appropriate personal protective equipment, management accountability for occupational health, and external oversight by the Health and Safety Executive.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Severity of COVID-19 at elevated exposure to perfluorinated alkylates 92%
- Evaluating Fomite Risk of Brown Paper Bags Storing Personal Protective Equipment Exposed to SARS-CoV-2: A Quasi-Experimental Study 92%
- Aerosol tracer testing in Boeing 767 and 777 aircraft to simulate exposure potential of infectious aerosol such as SARS-CoV-2 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brick kiln pollution and its impact on health: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Exposome-wide associations and polyexposure risks of workplace chemical exposures on adult asthma: The Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS) 93%
- Occupational Farm Work Activities Influence Workers’ Indoor Home Microbiome 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging of Respiratory Protective Equipment on the assumed risk of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol exposure in patient-facing healthcare workers delivering secondary care: a rapid review 91%
- Minimizing exposure to respiratory droplets, ‘jet riders’ and aerosols in air-conditioned hospital rooms by a ‘Shield-and-Sink’ strategy 90%
- Ventilation and detection of airborne SARS-CoV-2: elucidating high-risk spaces in naturally ventilated healthcare settings 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- HIPTox – Hazard Identification Platform to Assess the Health Impacts from Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollutant Exposures, through Mechanistic Toxicology: A single-centre double-blind human exposure trial protocol 92%
- Assessing the Impact of Non-exhaust Emissions on the Asthmatic Airway (IONA) Protocol for a randomised three exposure crossover study 92%
- Gastroenterology Procedures Generate Aerosols: an Air Quality Turnover Solution to Mitigate the Risk 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.