Back

Development of a Stable Human iPSC Line from Peripheral Blood: A Control Resource for Disease Modeling

Malakar, S.; Thamodaran, V.; Halder, T.; Joshi, D.; Das, P.

2025-08-21 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.08.21.671443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionTraditional disease modeling approaches have primarily utilized animal models and immortalized cell lines to investigate disease mechanisms and develop therapeutic strategies. However, previous research indicates that only about 5% of therapeutic interventions tested in animal models eventually receive regulatory approval for human use, highlighting limitations. The discovery of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by Yamanakas team in 2007 has revolutionized the field with remarkable possibilities for modeling human diseases, drug testing, and regenerative medicine. Differentiated cells derived from iPSCs in two-dimensional (2D) monolayers offer a relatively straightforward system to study disease pathogenesis and underlying molecular mechanisms. ObjectiveThe present study aimed to generate and characterize an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line from peripheral blood mono-nuclear cells (PBMCs) of a healthy individual intending to serve as an age and gender-matched control for future disease modeling and regenerative medicine research. Materials and MethodsPBMCs were isolated from a healthy 31-year-old male volunteer. Somatic reprogramming was performed using episomal vectors expressing OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and L-MYC. The resulting colonies were cultured and characterized for pluripotency markers by immunocytochemistry demonstrating the ability to differentiate into three germ layers. Karyotype analysis was performed to check the chromosomal abnormalities. InferencesThe resulting iPSC line exhibited pluripotency markers with the differentiation ability into three germ layers. Karyotyping analysis confirmed a normal chromosomal profile in both the donor and the reprogrammed iPSC line. This iPSC line could be a valuable resource as a healthy control for disease modeling and will contribute to advancing stem cell research with potential for regenerative medicine applications.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.9%
2
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
8
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
19
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Cell Cycle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%