Integration of publicly available datasets reveals pesticide-associated genetic variation in a wild non-target animal
Scholier, T.; Guignard, D.; Kosnik, M.
Show abstract
Pesticide use is ubiquitous. While pesticide resistance in target species such as insects is a well-known phenomenon, it is less known how pesticide exposures affect the genetics of non-target species. Here, we demonstrate the research value of integrating existing datasets to study the relationship between chemicals and biodiversity from the genetics perspective by analyzing spatial pesticide concentration data and genetic data from Europe that were not initially generated for toxicological purposes. Specifically, we found associations between environmental pesticide concentrations and genetic variation (i.e., single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) in a non-target species, the wild boar. Gene Ontology (GO) terms and biological signaling pathways related to nervous system function were overrepresented for the impacted genes, especially for insecticides and fungicides. Further, we found that external studies characterizing the molecular mechanisms of these pesticides revealed the same pesticide - GO relationships as those observed in our analysis. Our results show that pesticide-induced genetic changes may not be constrained to target species but may also have an impact on the long-term viability of other wildlife populations. We therefore encourage further research into this area and collaboration across disciplines to develop more comprehensive designated datasets for such analyses. This finding also urges the consideration and inclusion of chemical exposure into conservation protection strategies and greater consideration of genetic impacts from chemicals in environmental risk assessment.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A staged approach using ants as test organism in ecotoxicology 94%
- A Bayesian network approach to assess the influence of climate change and pesticide use practices on the ecological risks of pesticides in a protected Mediterranean wetland 94%
- A curated knowledgebase enabling a network perspective on endocrine disrupting chemicals and their biological systems-level perturbations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Role of Fish as Surrogates for Amphibians in Pesticide Ecological Risk Assessment 95%
- Differential neurobehavioral responses to silica nanoparticles and temperature in a wild rhabditid nematode and C. elegans: toward an exposome map of phenotypes 93%
- Low concentrations of ethylene bisdithiocarbamate pesticides maneb and mancozeb impair manganese and zinc homeostasis to induce oxidative stress and caspase-dependent apoptosis in human hepatocytes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Planarian behavioral screening is a useful invertebrate model for evaluating seizurogenic chemicals 96%
- C. elegans pharyngeal pumping provides a whole organism bio-assay to investigate anti-cholinesterase intoxication and antidotes 92%
- Predicted Versus Observed Activity of PCB Mixtures Toward the Ryanodine Receptor 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low Temperatures Lead to Higher Toxicity of the Fungicide Folpet to Larval Stages of Rana temporaria and Bufotes viridis 94%
- Osmia bicornis is rarely an adequate regulatory surrogate species. Comparing its acute sensitivity towards multiple insecticides with regulatory Apis mellifera endpoints. 94%
- Historical trends of the ecotoxicological pesticide risk from the main grain crops in Rolling Pampa (Argentina) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Endocrine disrupting chemicals and COVID-19 relationships: a computational systems biology approach 92%
- Network-based investigation of petroleum hydrocarbons-induced ecotoxicological effects and their risk assessment 92%
- Longitudinal assessment of mycotoxin co-exposures in exclusively breastfed infants 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.