Back

PathPCNet: Pathway Principal Component-Based Interpretable Framework for Drug Sensitivity Prediction

Adhikari, B.; Sobhan, M.; Sutradhar, A.; Narasimhan, G.; Mondal, A. M.

2025-08-24 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.20.668802 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Precision medicine aims to identify significant biomarkers and effective drugs tailored to individual genomic profiles, thereby enabling personalized treatment strategies. Drug efficacy is often attributed to drug response, commonly measured as the concentration of a drug required to inhibit a biological activity. In contrast, drug sensitivity reflects how strongly a tumor responds to a drug, where a lower effective dose indicates higher sensitivity. Machine learning-based drug response prediction has the potential to accelerate biomarker discovery and facilitate the development of more effective therapeutics. In this study, we present PathPCNet, a novel interpretable deep learning framework that integrates multi-omics data (copy number variation, mutation, and RNA sequencing) fused with biological pathways, drug molecular structure, and Principal Component Analysis for drug response prediction. Our model achieves a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.941 and an R-squared of 0.885, outperforming the existing pathway-based approaches. We employ SHAP-based model interpretation to quantify the contributions of omics and drug features, uncovering key pathways and gene-drug interactions associated with resistance mechanisms. These results demonstrate the utility of integrative deep learning models not only for accurate prediction but also for generating biologically meaningful insights, which can advance drug discovery and precision oncology. In addition, the framework also facilitates the identification of important pathways, genes, and atomic attributes of drugs related to drug sensitivity and different cancer types.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.