The impact of virtual reality cognitive behavioral therapy on mental disorders among children and youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, M. J.; Patel, J.; Tolulope Ibrahim, S.; Katapally, T. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for mental disorders, however, it can be associated with limited patient engagement, low adherence, and stigma among younger populations. Virtual reality (VR) environments can facilitate innovative approaches to enhance CBT implementation in a controlled and immersive way. ObjectivesThis study evaluates the impact of VR-CBT interventions on mental disorders in children and youth through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MethodsA search was conducted in PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies compared VR-CBT interventions to traditional therapy or control conditions. Extracted data included post-intervention means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using Hedges g and analyzed with a random-effects model. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) 2 tool and the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. ResultsIn total, 20 studies were included in the systematic review, with 85% (n = 17) utilizing virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET), and 15% (n = 3) implementing broader VR-CBT frameworks. VR technologies included wearable head-mounted displays (70%, n = 14), with 30% (n = 6) relying on non-wearable systems, and 15% (n = 3) incorporating gamification elements. Seven studies were included in a meta-analysis, which showed that VR-CBT was associated with a small to moderate reduction in mental disorder symptoms in full-scale studies (pooled Hedges g = -0.46 (95% CI: [-0.84], [-0.09]). ConclusionsVR-CBT interventions demonstrate potential for addressing mental disorders in children and youth, particularly when traditional therapy alone is insufficient and/or inaccessible.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From smartphone data to clinically relevant predictions: A systematic review of digital phenotyping methods in depression 92%
- Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with evidence-based psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of optimal implementation parameters 91%
- Problematic usage of the internet and eating disorders: a multifaceted, systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of Goal Management Training + (GMT + ) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design: A Process Description 93%
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 93%
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Self-blaming emotions in major depression: a randomised pilot trial comparing fMRI neurofeedback training with self-guided psychological strategies (NeuroMooD) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The association between academic pressure and adolescent mental health problems: A systematic review 93%
- Virtual mindfulness interventions to promote well-being in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review 92%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote virtual reality assessment elucidates self-blame-related action tendencies in depression 94%
- Prevalence and risk factors of internet gaming disorder and problematic internet use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A large online survey of Japanese adults 92%
- Clinical properties of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire: Development of a free calculator based on a Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.