Using theory of change to better address social and economic needs in mental health services
Baldwin, H.; Greenburgh, A.; Iskander-Reynolds, A.; Laporte, D.; Weir, H.; Asif, Z.; Bertram, M.; Crawford, A.; Duberry, G.; Lauter, S.; Lloyd-Evans, B.; Lovelock, C.; Ajozi, A.; Amato, A.-M.; Hardy, P.; McKenzie, S. M.; Swindle, G.; Henderson, C.; Das-Munshi, J.; Morgan, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionSocial and economic needs are greater in populations living with mental ill-health compared with the general population. However, services do not currently adequately assess these needs or offer appropriate interventions. A practical roadmap is required to work towards social and economic inclusion as a central component of mental health services. MethodsWe used the participatory Theory of Change method to conduct two qualitative workshops with health care professionals, third sector workers, academics and lived experience experts (Workshop 1, n=16; Workshop 2, n=14) in the area served by the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust. We co-developed a Theory of Change model which aimed to outline the key steps needed to put social inclusion at the centre of mental health care services in relation to the largest mental health trust in the United Kingdom (South London and Maudsley), yet with generalisable elements for mental health services in the United Kingdom more broadly. ResultsA shared goal for services was developed and agreed by participants of securing "a consistent mental health system that enables individuals to feel loved, valued, and capable of thriving beyond their basic needs". To progress from the current context to this shared goal, six objective pathways were co-produced to act as a roadmap: (1) Provision of person-centred culturally appropriate care; (2) Advocacy for funding for effective social inclusion services in line with need; (3) Advocacy for funding and support of social and peer programmes; (4) Co-located and localised community-based support hubs; (5) A shared feedback system with social inclusion Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) with an ability to include positive outcomes and drive accountability; and (6) A collaborative community service network. ConclusionsThis Theory of Change model offers a tangible framework to put social inclusion at the centre of mental health services. This model can be adapted and translated to other services and settings that are aiming to make social inclusion a core feature of their provision, beyond those in which it was developed.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 97%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 95%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 93%
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 93%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 97%
- Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative study 97%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 96%
- Co-design and evaluation of a youth-informed organisational tool to enhance trauma-informed practices in the UK public sector: a study protocol 95%
- NHS CHECK: protocol for a cohort study investigating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.