Back

Smart Microscopy: Current Implementations and a Roadmap for Interoperability

Hinderling, L.; Heil, H. S.; Rates, A.; Seidel, P.; Gunkel, M.; Diederich, B.; Guilbert, T.; Torro, R.; Bouchareb, O.; Demeautis, C.; Martin, C.; Brooks, S.; Sisamakis, E.; Erwan, G.; Johansson, K.; Ahnlinde, J. K.; Andre, O.; Nordenfelt, P.; Nordenfelt, P.; Pfander, C.; Reymann, J.; Lambert, T.; Cosenza, M. R.; Korbel, J. O.; Pepperkok, R.; Kapitein, L. C.; Pertz, O.; Norlin, N.; Halavatyi, A.; Camacho, R.

2025-08-20 cell biology
10.1101/2025.08.18.670881 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Smart microscopy is transforming life sciences by automating experimental imaging workflows and enabling real-time adaptation based on feedback from images and other data streams. This shift increases throughput, improves reproducibility, and expands the functional capabilities of microscopes. However, the current landscape is highly fragmented. Academic researchers often develop custom solutions for specific scientific needs, while industry offerings are typically proprietary and tied to specific hardware. This diversity, while fostering innovation, also creates major challenges in interoperability, reproducibility, and standardization, which slows progress and adaption. This article presents a collaborative effort between academic and industry leaders to survey the current state of smart microscopy, highlight representative implementations, and identify common technical and organizational barriers. We propose a framework for greater interoperability based on shared standards, modular software design, and community-driven development. Our goal is to support collaboration across the field and lay the groundwork for a more connected, reusable, and accessible smart microscopy ecosystem. We conclude with a call to action for researchers, hardware developers, and institutions to join in building an open, interoperable foundation that will unlock the full potential of smart microscopy in life science research.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.7%
3
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
4
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
7
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
8
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
9
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
10
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
12
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
14
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
17
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
19
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
26
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
29
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%